A new type of TGF‐beta, TGF‐beta 3, has been identified by cDNA characterization. The amino acid sequence of mature TGF‐beta 3 and its precursor has been derived from porcine and human cDNA sequences. The human TGF‐beta 3 gene is spread over seven exons as in the case of the TGF‐beta 1 gene. Comparison with TGF‐beta 1 and ‐beta 2 indicates a strong conservation of the mature sequences, but a relaxed homology in the precursor segments. TGF‐beta 3 mRNA is mainly expressed in cell lines from mesenchymal origin, suggesting a biological role different from the other TGFs‐beta.

Recent cDNA characterization has predicted the existence of a new member of the transforming growth factor family, transforming growth factor-beta 3 (TGF beta 3). However, nothing is known about the biological activities of the TGF beta 3 protein, since it has not been purified from any natural sources. We report here the recombinant expression in mammalian cells and the purification to apparent homogeneity of human TGF beta 3. The TGF beta 3 was evaluated in comparison with purified TGF beta 1 and TGF beta 2 in several assays for its effects on stimulation or inhibition of proliferation of mammalian cells. These analyses revealed that TGF beta 3 exerts activities similar to the two other TGF beta species, but that there are distinct differences in potencies between the different TGF beta forms depending on the cell type and assay used.

No abstract

No abstract

A murine fibroblast cell line (AKR-2B clone 84A) and an epithelial cell line (BALB/MK) were compared for their ability to bind different transforming growth factor-beta (TGF beta) species. The results of competitive binding assays indicated that the epithelial cells had a higher affinity for TGF beta than the fibroblasts. This difference may be the basis for the sensitivity of epithelial cells to much lower concentrations of TGF beta than fibroblasts. Affinity cross-linking studies showed that both cell types express the three cell surface TGF beta-binding molecules that have been previously described for a variety of cell types. The complexity of these cell surface binding proteins was further evaluated using all possible combinations of radiolabeled ligands in competition with each of the three unlabeled TGF beta species. Differences in the ability of specific TGF beta types to compete with radiolabeled TGF beta 2 for binding to the type I and II receptors were observed, with TGF beta 1 being more potent for epithelial cells, and TGF beta 2 being more potent for fibroblasts. In addition, a difference in the ability of different TGF beta species to compete the [125I]TGF beta 3 from epithelial cell surface receptors was apparent. TGF beta 2 was not able to compete with [125I]TGF beta 3 for binding to the type II receptor at any concentration tested, while TGF beta 1 and TGF beta 3 were about equally potent in competition for this receptor type. These differences in cell surface receptor binding of structurally and biologically similar molecules may reflect different functions for these molecules.