Introduction. Skeletal maturity assessment in Idiopathic Scoliosis (IS) is used for the evaluation of deformation progression risk, as well as selecting a method of treatment. The Sanders Maturity Scale (SMS) is based on the ossification of phalanges, metacarpal bones and radius rated on AP radiograms of the left hand. Aim. This retrospective study aimed to compare SMS to other skeletal maturity assessment methods used in daily practice. Materials and methods. We included 39 female patients with IS (50 series of radiograms) with a mean age of 13.4, ranging from 10.3 to 17.3. Each series of radiograms was evaluated by three observers with different experience. Skeletal maturity was assessed using the Sanders Maturity Scale (SMS), Risser sign, Greulich and Pyle (GP) atlas, as well as the closure of the triradiate cartilage. Results. The majority of patients, 17 out of 50 (34 %) were classified as type 3 (adolescent rapid – early). Intra-observer and inter-observer reliability for the SMS was very good (Krippendorff’s alpha >0.95). The GP and Risser method showed good reliability, whereas the triradiate cartilage closure assessment showed lower reliability. The Risser 0 grade corresponded with as many as four Sanders stages, 16 out of 20 (80 %) were rated Sanders 3. All radiograms with open triradiate cartilage (7/50, 14 %) were rated Sanders 2 or 3; they all received a Risser 0 grading. Conclusions. The SMS proved to have a very good intra-observer and inter-observer reliability, it is easy to be used by physicians and does not require an atlas. The SMS enhances the assessment of skeletal maturity of IS patients by providing additional stages in the early phase of growth (Risser 0).
Introduction Total Hip Arthroplasty is one of the most common orthopaedic procedures. Its outcome is assessed by radiographic evaluation. Two principal radiographic parameters are cup inclination and stem position angle. Aim The study aimed to compare radiological outcomes of two total hip arthroplasty techniques: Alloclassic Zweymüller versus Corail Pinnacle endoprostheses. Material and methods Medical histories of 345 patients who had a hip replacement between 2007 and 2017 were reviewed. Patients with primary total hip arthroplasty with both of mentioned systems were included in the research. Seven observers individually evaluated the radiological images of the 67 endoprostheses (39 Alloclassic Zweymüller and 26 Corail Pinnacle). The cup inclination and the stem position angle were measured using MB-Ruler programme. Results There was no statistical difference (p > 0.338) in cup inclination angle between Alloclassic Zweymüller and Pinnacle cups, with the angle ranging from 31.01° to 58.80° (45.20° on average) and from 30.61° to 59.1° (43.60° on average), respectively. Femoral stem position did not differ between both types of endoprosthesis (p > 0.932), ranging from −1.05° to 7.87° (3.09° on average) for Alloclassic Zweymüller and 0.35° to 7.79° (3.06° on average) for Corail Pinnacle stem. ICC (Intraclass Coefficient Correlation) was estimated and their 95% confident intervals were calculated for cup inclination and stem position showing good reliability of cup inclination measurements. Conclusions Both types of endoprostheses presented similar radiological outcomes. Cup inclination can be used by non-experienced medical staff to reliably assess the postoperative radiograms. Keywords: cementless hip replacement, radiological outcomes, imaging.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.