S. Performance of coagulation tests in patients on therapeutic doses of dabigatran: a cross-sectional pharmacodynamic study based on peak and trough plasma levels. J Thromb Haemost 2013; 11: 1493-1502.Summary. Background: Knowledge of anticoagulation status during dabigatran therapy may be desirable in certain clinical situations. Objective: To determine the coagulation tests that are most useful for assessing dabigatran's anticoagulant effect. Methods: Peak and trough blood samples from 35 patients taking dabigatran 150 mg twice daily, and one sample each from 30 non-anticoagulated individuals, were collected. Mass spectrometry and various coagulation assays were performed. 'Therapeutic range' was defined as the range of plasma dabigatran concentrations determined by mass spectrometry between the 2.5th and 97.5th percentiles of all values. Results: The therapeutic range was 27-411 ng mL À1. The prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), determined with multiple reagents, and activated clotting time (ACT) were insensitive to therapeutic dabigatran: 29%, 18% and 40% of samples had a normal PT, APTT, and ACT, respectively. However, normal PT, ACT and APTT ruled out dabigatran levels above the 75th percentile. The thrombin clotting time (TCT) correlated well and linearly with dabigatran levels below the 50th percentile, but was unmeasurable above it. The dilute thrombin time, ecarin clotting time and ecarin chromogenic assay showed linear correlations with dabigatran levels over a broad range, and identified therapeutic and supratherapeutic levels. Conclusions: The prothrombin time, APTT and ACT are often normal in spite of therapeutic dabigatran plasma levels. The TCT is useful for detecting minimal dabigatran levels. The dilute thrombin time and chromogenic and clotting ecarin assays accurately identify therapeutic and supratherapeutic dabigatran levels. This trial is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (#NCT01588327).

Context.-Rivaroxaban is a new oral anticoagulant that functions as a direct anti-Xa inhibitor. Although routine monitoring is not required, measurement of plasma concentrations may be necessary in certain clinical situations. Routine coagulation assays, such as the prothrombin time and, to a lesser degree, activated partial thromboplastin time, correlate with drug concentration, but because of reagent variability, these methods are not reliable for determining rivaroxaban anticoagulation.Objective.-To compare different methods and calibrators for measuring rivaroxaban, including the chromogenic anti-Xa assay, which, when calibrated with a rivaroxaban standard, may be more appropriate for determining anticoagulation.Design.-We compared measured rivaroxaban concentrations with the same anti-Xa kit but used different calibrators, with different anti-Xa kits but the same calibrators, with antithrombin-supplemented anti-Xa kit versus nonsupplemented kits, and with 2 methods based on rivaroxaban-calibrated, high-phospholipid, dilute Russell viper venom time. Regression and paired t test statistics were used to determine correlation and significant differences among methods and calibrator sources.Results.-Although there was strong correlation, statistically significant biases existed among methods that report rivaroxaban levels. A single-source calibrator did not alleviate those differences among methods. High-phospholipid Russell viper venom reagents correlated with rivaroxaban concentration but were not better than chromogenic anti-Xa methods.Conclusions.-Rivaroxaban-calibrated, anti-Xa measurements correlate well, but the clinical significance of the variation with rivaroxaban measurements is uncertain. The antithrombin-supplemented, anti-Xa method should be avoided for measuring rivaroxaban.

A high rate of discontinuation of dabigatran, mainly due to GI symptoms, was observed. There does not appear to be any specific predictor of dabigatran tolerance. When prescribed according to guidelines, rates of serious adverse events associated with dabigatran appear to be low.