Terrestrial LiDAR (light detection and ranging) technologies have created new means of quantifying forest canopy structure, allowing not only the estimation of biomass, but also descriptions of the position and variability in canopy elements in space. Such measures provide novel structural information broadly useful to ecologists. There is a growing need for both a detailed taxonomy of forest canopy structural complexity (CSC) and open, transparent, and flexible tools to quantify complexity in ways that will advance foundational ecological knowledge of structure‐function relationships. The CSC taxonomy we present groups structural descriptors into five categories: leaf area and density, canopy height, canopy arrangement, canopy openness, and canopy variability. This paper also introduces the r package forestr, the first open‐source r package for the calculation of CSC metrics from terrestrial LiDAR data. The r package forestr is an analysis toolbox that works with portable canopy LiDAR (PCL) data and other pixelated/voxelized point clouds derived from terrestrial LiDAR scanning (TLS) data to calculate CSC metrics of interest to ecologists, modellers, forest managers, and remote sensing scientists.

Structure-function relationships are central to many ecological paradigms. Chief among these is the linkage of net primary production (NPP) with species diversity and canopy structure. Using the National Ecological Observatory Network (NEON) as a subcontinental-scale research platform, we examined how temperate-forest NPP relates to several measures of site-level canopy structure and tree species diversity. Novel multidimensional canopy traits describing structural complexity, most notably canopy rugosity, were more strongly related to site NPP than were species diversity measures and other commonly characterized canopy structural features. The amount of variation in site-level NPP explained by canopy rugosity alone was 83%, which was substantially greater than that explained individually by vegetation area index (31%) or Shannon's index of species diversity (30%). Forests that were more structurally complex, had higher vegetation-area indices, or were more diverse absorbed more light and used light more efficiently to power biomass production, but these relationships were most strongly tied to structural complexity. Implications for ecosystem modeling and management are wide ranging, suggesting structural complexity traits are broad, mechanistically robust indicators of NPP that, in application, could improve the prediction and management of temperate forest carbon sequestration.

Understanding how the physical structure of forest canopies influences light absorption is a long‐standing area of inquiry fundamental to the physical sciences, including the modeling and interpretation of biogeochemical cycles. Conventional measures of forest canopy structure used to infer canopy light absorption are often limited to leaf or vegetation area indexes. However, LiDAR‐derived measures of canopy structural complexity (CSC) that describe the arrangement of vegetation may improve prediction of canopy light absorption by providing novel information on canopy‐light interactions not regulated by leaf area alone. We measured multiple indexes of CSC, vegetation area index (VAI), and the fraction of photosynthetically active radiation absorbed (fPAR) across the eastern United States using portable canopy LiDAR to evaluate how different canopy structural attributes relate to fPAR. Our survey included sites from the National Ecological Observation Network and university field stations. Measures of CSC were more strongly coupled with fPAR under high light (>1,000 μmol m−2 s−1 PAR). Under low light conditions, when diffuse light predominates, light scattering weakens the dependency of fPAR on CSC. A multivariate model including CSC parameters and VAI explains ~89% of the intersite variance in fPAR, an improvement of over a VAI only linear model (r2 = 0.73). The inclusion of CSC metrics in canopy light absorption models could increase confidence in predictions of biogeochemical cycles and energy balance.

Vegetation canopy structure is a fundamental characteristic of terrestrial ecosystems that defines vegetation types and drives ecosystem functioning. We use the multivariate structural trait composition of vegetation canopies to classify ecosystems within a global canopy structure spectrum. Across the temperate forest sub‐set of this spectrum, we assess gradients in canopy structural traits, characterise canopy structural types (CST) and evaluate drivers and functional consequences of canopy structural variation. We derive CSTs from multivariate canopy structure data, illustrating variation along three primary structural axes and resolution into six largely distinct and functionally relevant CSTs. Our results illustrate that within‐ecosystem successional processes and disturbance legacies can produce variation in canopy structure similar to that associated with sub‐continental variation in forest types and eco‐climatic zones. The potential to classify ecosystems into CSTs based on suites of structural traits represents an important advance in understanding and modelling structure–function relationships in vegetated ecosystems.

The study of vegetation community and structural change has been central to ecology for over a century, yet the ways in which disturbances reshape the physical structure of forest canopies remain relatively unknown. Moderate severity disturbances affect different canopy strata and plant species, resulting in variable structural outcomes and ecological consequences. Terrestrial lidar (light detection and ranging) offers an unprecedented view of the interior arrangement and distribution of canopy elements, permitting the derivation of multidimensional measures of canopy structure that describe several canopy structural traits (CSTs) with known links to ecosystem function. We used lidar-derived CSTs within a machine learning framework to detect and describe the structural changes that result from various disturbance agents, including moderate severity fire, ice storm damage, age-related senescence, hemlock woolly adelgid, beech bark disease, and chronic acidification. We found that fire and ice storms primarily affected the amount and position of vegetation within canopies, while acidification, senescence, pathogen, and insect infestation altered canopy arrangement and complexity. Only two of the six disturbance agents significantly reduced leaf area, counter to common assumptions regarding many moderate severity disturbances. While findings are limited in their generalizability due to lack of replication among disturbances, they do suggest that the current limitations of standard disturbance detection methods-such as optical-based remote sensing platforms, which are often above-canopy perspectives-limit our ability to understand the full ecological and structural impacts of disturbance, and to evaluate the consistency of structural patterns within and among disturbance agents. A more broadly inclusive definition of ecological disturbance that incorporates multiple aspects of canopy structural change may potentially improve the modeling, detection, and prediction of functional implications of moderate severity disturbance as well as broaden our understanding of the ecological impacts of disturbance.