Historically, intraoperative analysis of knee fracture procedures relied upon a fluoroscopic reduction assessment by the surgeon. This is a subjective assessment due to the lack of linear measurement reference data. Compared with the knee, the ankle and wrist have well-established bony anatomical relationships to guide reduction assessment during fracture treatment. The purpose of this study was to (1) determine the width ratios in the knee (plateau to femur) with aging, and (2) determine knee width changes with aging. One-hundred and fifty consecutive uninjured knee radiographs were reviewed. In all age groups, the width ratio of the articular distal femoral (ADF) to the articular tibial plateau (ATP) is greater than 1.0 and between 1.03 and 1.05. The tibia plateau width is on average 9.34 mm wider and the femoral width is 8.0 mm wider in the 61 to 80 age group than the ATP and the ADF in the younger age groups. In conclusion, the articular tibial plateau width and the articular distal femoral width are nearly equal across ages 20 to 80 years. An absolute articular width value by age cannot be assigned because articular widths change with aging.

Objectives: To validate a novel intraoperative method of quantifying femoral head perfusion in adult patients with femoral neck fractures and to determine whether the lack of a perfusion waveform correlates with the development of osteonecrosis, nonunion, or reoperation. Design: Prospective cohort. Setting: Level 1 trauma center. Patients/Participants: Nineteen patients with 20 acute femoral neck fractures treated with hip-preserving surgical fixation. All patients underwent intraoperative quantification of femoral head perfusion. Intervention: Intraoperative quantification of femoral head perfusion pressure and waveform utilizing an intracranial pressure monitor. Main outcome measurements: Radiographic union, avascular necrosis, revision surgery. Results: Nineteen patients (8 male, 11 female, average age 56 ± 21 years) with 20 femoral neck fractures were enrolled. Eight fractures were stable (Garden 1-2/OTA B1.1–1.3) and 12 were unstable (Garden 3-4/OTAB2.1–3.3). A waveform was present in 12 of 20 cases. The average pressures were systolic 36.8 mm Hg, diastolic 30.8 mm Hg, pulse pressure 6.0 mm Hg. A perfusion waveform was significantly associated with advanced age (P = 0.02) and accompanied by trend toward stable fracture patterns. There were 4 deaths during the 1-year follow-up period (20%), and there were 5 conversions to total hip arthroplasty (25%). There was no significant association between revision surgery or death with the absence of a waveform. Conclusions: Our study demonstrated the feasibility of a relatively low cost, minimally invasive, technique to quantify femoral head perfusion. In our limited sample, the absence of perfusion did not correlate with our main outcomes; however, the trend toward correlation with increased fracture displacement was as expected. A larger cohort of patients will be needed to detect a significant difference between those with and without a perfusion waveform with regards to our primary outcomes. Further study is needed to delineate the role such data may play in medical decision making at the time of index surgery. Level of Evidence: Prognostic Level II.

Background: Fractures of the talus are a rare but challenging injury. This study sought to quantify the area of osseous exposure afforded by a posteromedial approach to the talus and medial malleolar osteotomy. Methods: Five fresh-frozen cadaveric lower extremities were dissected using a posteromedial approach and medial malleolar osteotomy respectively. Following exposure, the talar surfaces directedly visualized were marked and captured using a calibrated digital image. The digital images were then analyzed using ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health) to calculate the surface area of the exposure. Results: The average square area of talus exposed using the posteromedial approach was 9.70 cm2 (SD = 2.20, range 7.20-12.46). The average quantity of talar exposure expressed as a percentage was 9% (SD = 1.58, range 7.03-10.40). The average square area of talus exposed using a medial malleolar osteotomy was 14.32 cm2 (SD = 2.00, range 11.26-16.66). The average quantity of talar exposure expressed as a percentage was 12.94% (SD = 1.79, range 9.97-14.73). The posteromedial approach provided superior visualization of the posterior talus, whereas the medial malleolar osteotomy offered greater access to the medial body. Conclusion: The posteromedial approach and medial malleolar osteotomy allow for significant exposure of the talus, yielding 9.70 and 14.32 cm2, respectively. Given the differing portions of the talus exposed, surgeons may prefer to use the posteromedial approach for operative fixation of posterior process fractures and elect to use a medial malleolar osteotomy in cases requiring more extensive medial and distal exposure for neck or neck/body fractures. Level of Evidence: Level IV.

No abstract