<span>Many university academics disagree with the rationale that we should pursue mobile learning because 21st century students are apparently demanding it. We argue that the only defensible rationale for making mobile learning part of pedagogy is because it enhances student learning. This presentation shares results from research with 135 students engaged in mobile learning over two semesters. It addresses the question of whether </span><em>Blackboard Mobile Learn</em><span> made a perceived difference to their learning. Results revealed that in-class, students used their mobile devices for </span><em>Blackboard Mobile Learn</em><span> to the same extent as they used them for searching the web for study, accessing university web pages, email and making </span><em>Facebook</em><span> posts, but less than they used them for browsing the web for pleasure and </span><em>Facebook</em><span> reading. The majority of students were neutral when asked if they prefer </span><em>Mobile Learn</em><span> over PC access to </span><em>Blackboard</em><span>. Students were likewise neutral when asked whether they perceived </span><em>iPads</em><span> to improve their learning. There was higher frequency agreement that using </span><em>iPads</em><span> motivated them to learn. Qualitative feedback from focus groups was mixed, but largely positive. The overall interpretation was that it is a matter of course that students would access their subject site via mobile devices.</span>
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.