BackgroundUltrasound is a vital part in many medical schools' curriculum. Although there is strong support for the use of student tutors (STs), there is a lack in gauging their effectiveness with more difficult organ systems such as the musculoskeletal (MSK) system. We aim to determine the effectiveness of using STs versus expert ultrasound instructors (UIs) when teaching MSK ultrasound. MethodologyMedical students were recruited to participate in an MSK workshop to identify superficial volar arm structures (radial nerve, radial artery, median nerve, ulnar artery, ulnar nerve) using Butterfly iQ. In total, 14 participants were taught by STs and 10 participants were taught by UIs. Participants imaged the five structures and answered surveys gauging their confidence via five-point Likert scales. ResultsThere was no significant difference in confidence or identification accuracy for all five structures between the two groups. However, there was a significant difference in confidence in the understanding of basic ultrasound concepts in favor of the UI group (p < 0.05). A greater number of students were more confident in identifying all five structures when taught by STs, but more students correctly identified the structures when taught by UIs. ConclusionsThe results on confidence could be due to positive peer perception. Both groups scored relatively high in their identification accuracies, promoting the successful use of STs. The successful use of STs in teaching MSK ultrasound opens the possibility to developing peer-led ultrasound curriculum on more complex ultrasound topics in the future.

Introduction Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is a rapidly evolving field of diagnostic medicine as its low cost, portability, and versatility have made handheld ultrasound (US) probes an invaluable tool for many modern physicians. Despite US’s benefits as a bedside evaluative tool, many medical schools have not integrated POCUS into their pre-clerkship medical education due to a lack of equipment and faculty. The first objective of our study was to determine whether student tutors (STs) would be effective resources to teach musculoskeletal (MSK) and vascular US to preclinical medical students. The second objective of our study was to determine whether students who previously attended ST-run MSK US workshops perform better in vascular US than those who did not. Methods Six POCUS workshops were led by STs after approval from experienced US faculty. These included US workshops on gastrointestinal structures, forearm structures, joint structures, basic echocardiography, and US-guided IV access. We collected data from two of our six workshops. We developed surveys to gauge the confidence and ability of students to perform US after an MSK workshop and US-guided IV access workshop led by STs. We also measured students' US abilities and collected student feedback after our US-guided IV access workshop. We evaluated students’ US competency in US-guided IV access via their ability to correctly position the US probe, angle the needle of insertion, move the probe with the needle, and access the vein based on the accuracy of the movements. We divided student results into two groups: students who previously attended the MSK workshop before attending the US-guided IV access workshop and students who did not attend the MSK workshop before attending the US-guided IV access workshop. We used averages, frequencies, and two-tailed t-tests to analyze the survey responses and US-guided IV access skill assessments. Results Fifty percent of first- and second-year surveyed students “agreed,” and 32.4% “strongly agreed” that they felt confident using US after an ST-run MSK workshop. About 29.4% of surveyed students “agreed” and 41.2% “strongly agreed” that they felt comfortable explaining basic US concepts, such as proper probe positioning and echogenicity. The group of students who attended the MSK workshop prior to the peripheral IV workshop scored similarly to the students who did not attend the MSK workshop (14.33±1.03 versus 14.20±0.84 points). Both groups of students had an average of over 94% accuracy in technique, positioning, angling, moving the US probe, and achieving US-guided venous access after being taught by STs. Qualitative surveying noted positive student feedback, such as "Teacher was great at guiding us through the procedure." Survey responses also included suggestions on adding and diversifying equipment, such as “[It would be useful to have a] different type of needle to see the difference on ultrasound.” Conclusion ...