Background and objectivePeriprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is one of the dreaded complications in patients after arthroplasty surgeries, owing to the risk of morbidity and arduous investigations and management associated with it. Nevertheless, as Malaysia is currently battling against the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)-induced coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic head-on, the treatment for other non-life-threatening diseases including PJI has taken a backseat. In this study, we present a case series of 11 patients with PJI who were managed surgically at the largest tertiary hospital in Malaysia and we hope to shed some light on the difficulties we have encountered during this trying period. Patients and methodsPatients with PJIs who underwent surgical intervention during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic (March 1, 2020, to June 30, 2021) were reviewed and included in this study. The demographic profile of the patients, presenting complaints, prosthesis topography, biochemical investigative findings, surgical interventions, and short-term outcomes were summarized. ResultsA total of 11 patients were treated surgically at Hospital Kuala Lumpur for PJI. Among them, five patients are still awaiting their second-stage surgeries despite the completion of their antibiotic regimes, and they are fit for the procedure. ConclusionThe COVID-19 pandemic has wreaked havoc on the treatment of patients with PJI. In a setting with scarce resources, surgeons should strongly consider single-stage revision surgeries for the treatment of patients with PJI.

Background and objectiveFemoral neck fractures are relatively rare in young adults, but they result in prolonged loss of function in these patients, thereby placing a huge burden on a country's healthcare and economy. Femoral neck fractures in young adults are normally treated with head salvage surgery. However, primary head replacement surgeries have been gaining traction recently to expedite the recovery of these patients. In this study, we aimed to investigate the outcomes in young patients with femoral neck fractures and factors associated with their complications. Patients and methodsPatients with femoral neck fractures who underwent surgery in three tertiary hospitals [Hospital Tengku Ampuan Afzan (HTAA), Hospital Sultan Haji Ahmad Shah (HOSHAS), and Hospital Kuala Lipis] in Pahang state in Malaysia were reviewed and included in this study. The demographic profile of the patients, injury patterns, intervention details, functional outcomes, and complications were analyzed. The comparison between the sociodemographics, clinical assessment, and complication outcomes was analyzed using statistical software. ResultsThe complications were associated with the mechanism of injury, capsulotomy, and type of fixation. A total of 46 patients were included in the study. Most of the patients were found to have severe displacement based on Garden and Pauwels classification. The majority of the patients underwent femoral head salvage surgeries. Almost half of the patients sustained complications and were unable to achieve weight-bearing status at six months postoperatively. ConclusionDespite a relatively short follow-up period in our study, femoral neck fractures in young adults were found to be associated with a high rate of complications. Primary head replacement surgeries should be considered in high-risk patients with femoral neck fractures.

Joint replacement surgeries have been performed to treat joint arthropathies with excellent outcomes. As the number of joint replacement surgeries surges, the incidence of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) has also increased. Currently, two-stage revision surgery is the gold standard in the treatment of periprosthetic joint infection. Two-stage revision surgery involves joint washout, the removal of the primary implant, the insertion of a cement spacer, and subsequently the reimplantation of prosthesis after the infection has been eliminated. Custom-made articulating cement spacer has been used with success to improve the patient's ambulatory status and quality of life. Nevertheless, custom-made articulating cement spacer or commercialized cement mold is generally costly. By the modification of previous authors' techniques, we manage to fabricate reusable silicone molds, which can be used to create articulating cement spacers for both hip and knee joints. We share two case reports to illustrate how these fabricated silicone molds can be a cost-effective technique to create articulating cement spacers to manage periprosthetic joint infection in both hip and knee joints. Surgeons in resource-deprived countries can utilize this technique to create articulating cement spacers with minimal cost, but they need to discuss with their patients and check with the local regulatory board on the feasibility of this technique to create cement spacer that will be used in a patient.

Introduction: This is a cross-sectional study to evaluate the functional outcome of ACL Reconstruction between BPTB and hamstring graft who underwent ACL Reconstruction between January to June 2012 at our institution. Methods: Functional IKDC scoring was done pre-operatively, at 6 months and one year. Arthrometric measurements were taken using KT2000. Lysholm score and SF-36 were assessed at one year. Resuts: All patients are male, mean age is 29 (21 to 37 years old). 21.4% patients from patella BPTB group and 13% of hamstring group had anterior knee pain. 50% of patients from both groups complained of numbness over operative site. Average time return to pre-injury sports activity for BPTB group was 7.9 months, whereas for hamstring group was 8.3 months. KT-2000 measurements revealed an average side to side laxity difference average of 6.6mm in BPTB group and 7.9mm in hamstring group. Pivot shift were negative at 6 months in all patients. IKDC knee scoring significantly improved from grade C or D to grade B in 82% of BPTB group and 63% in hamstring group one year post operatively. There were no difference between both groups in terms of SF-36, Lysholm score and knee range of motion. Conclusions: There are no difference in functional outcome and lysholm knee score between the two groups although there is a discrepancy of IKDC score and arthrometric measurement at one year. Although both groups have moderate anterior laxity after one year, but they are asymptomatic and able to go back to preinjury sports activities.

Hetorotopic Ossification (HO) is abnormal formation of bone in the soft tissue. Heterotopic ossification of the hip following reamed interlocking medullary nail is uncommon and it has received little attention from the clinician. We take this opportunity to report a young man who presented with symptomatic heterotopic ossification of the hip eight months post antegrade reamed interlocking medullary nail which failed conservative treatment. Reamed intramedullary nailing and delayed mobilization are the contributing factors in this patient. The pathophysiology of this condition is not fully understood. As a result, there is no consensus in the prevention of heterotopic ossification in such patients. Similarly, the management of this condition also is lacking but resection is the treatment of choice for symptomatic patient.