Objectives: To test the ability of palliative care screening criteria to improve access to palliative care services in the PICU and examine the association between palliative care team involvement and ICU and hospital length of stay. Design: Prospective interventional quality improvement study. Setting: PICU at a quaternary academic medical center. Patients: All patients admitted to the PICU who met criteria for palliative care referral over a 9-month period. Intervention: Consensus palliative care consultation criteria were created by pediatric critical care medicine and palliative care providers, and palliative care referral was encouraged for all PICU patients meeting criteria. Measurements and Main Results: Palliative care referral rates increased significantly after screening criteria implementation. We identified 100 patients who were eligible for palliative care services, and referrals were made for 70 patients (70%). Patients were divided into three groups based on palliative care status: patients new to the palliative care team, patients with an existing palliative care relationship, and patients who did not have a palliative care referral. By the end of study, patients who had an existing relationship with the palliative care team were more likely to still be alive and to have limitations of medical interventions in place, whereas patients who did not have a palliative care referral were more likely to be deceased and to have died in the PICU. After correcting for other factors, including severity of illness, patients who were new to the palliative care team experienced greater delay in palliative care referral and had significantly longer PICU and hospital length of stay than those who were already known to the palliative care team. Conclusions: Palliative care screening criteria are effective tools for improving access to palliative care services in the PICU; however, widespread adoption may produce a significant increase in palliative care demand. The association between an existing palliative care relationship and reduction in resource utilization deserves further investigation as does the perceived benefit of palliative care involvement in the patient, family, and staff experience.

OBJECTIVES: To characterize the impact of public health interventions on the volume and characteristics of admissions to the PICU. DESIGN: Multicenter retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Six U.S. referral PICUs during February 15, 2020–May 14, 2020, compared with the same months during 2017–2019 (baseline). Patients: PICU admissions excluding admissions for illnesses due to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 and readmissions during the same hospitalization. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Primary outcome was admission volumes during the period of stay-at-home orders (March 15, 2020–May 14, 2020) compared with baseline. Secondary outcomes were hospitalization characteristics including advanced support (e.g., invasive mechanical ventilation), PICU and hospital lengths of stay, and mortality. We used generalized linear mixed modeling to compare patient and admission characteristics during the stay-at-home orders period to baseline. We evaluated 7,960 admissions including 1,327 during March 15, 2020–May 14, 2020. Daily admissions and patients days were lower during the period of stay-at-home orders compared with baseline: median admissions 21 (interquartile range, 17–25) versus 36 (interquartile range, 30–42) (p < 0.001) and median patient days 93.0 (interquartile range, 55.9–136.7) versus 143.6 (interquartile range, 108.5–189.2) (p < 0.001). Admissions during the period of stay-at-home orders were less common in young children and for respiratory and infectious illnesses and more common for poisonings, endocrinopathies and for children with race/ethnicity categorized as other/unspecified. There were no differences in hospitalization characteristics except fewer patients received noninvasive ventilation during the period of stay-at-home orders. CONCLUSIONS: Reductions in PICU admissions suggest that much of pediatric critical illness in younger children and for respiratory and infectious illnesses may be preventable through targeted public health strategies.

No abstract

Purulent pericarditis survival hinges upon early empiric antibiotic therapy targeting resistant Staphylococcus, rapid diagnostic efforts, and expeditious pericardial drainage when diagnosed. An aggressive multidisciplinary approach provided for complete recovery in both cases, and both children were discharged with normal cardiac function. These two cases emphasize the need for consideration of CA-MRSA presenting with purulent pericarditis as an etiology for refractory shock.