Nocturia is common across populations. It is most prevalent in older people but it also affects a significant proportion of younger individuals. Clinicians should be alert to the possibility that nocturia may impact the sleep, quality of life and overall health of their patients. Since the condition is highly multifactorial, frequency-volume charts are invaluable tools for the diagnosis of underlying factors and for treatment selection.
Objective To investigate the efficacy and safety of oral desmopressin in the treatment of nocturia in men. Patients and methods Men aged o18 years with verified nocturia (otwo voids/night) and nocturnal urine production greater than their maximum functional bladder capacity were recruited. A 3-week dosetitration phase established the optimum desmopressin dose (0.1, 0.2 or 0.4 mg). After a 1-week 'washout' period, patients who responded in the dose-titration period were randomized to receive the optimal dose of desmopressin or placebo in a double-blind design for 3 weeks. Results In all, 151 patients entered the double-blind period (86 treated with desmopressin, 65 with placebo). In the desmopressin group 28 (34%) patients and in the placebo group two (3%) patients (P<0.001) had fewer than half the number of nocturnal voids relative to baseline; the mean number of nocturnal voids decreased from 3.0 to 1.7 and from 3.2 to 2.7, respectively, reflecting a mean decrease of 43% and 12% (P<0.001). The mean duration of the first sleep period increased by 59% (from 2.7 to 4.5 h) in the desmopressin group, compared with an increase of 21% (from 2.5 to 2.9 h) in the placebo group (P<0.001). The mean nocturnal diuresis decreased by 36% (from 1.5 to 0.9 mL/min) in the desmopressin group and by 6% (from 1.7 to 1.5 mL/min) in the placebo group (P<0.001). The mean ratio of night/24-h urine volume decreased by 23% and 1% (P<0.001), and the mean ratio of night/day urine volume decreased by 27% and increased by 3% (P<0.001) for the desmopressin and placebo groups, respectively. In the double-blind treatment period, similar numbers of patients had adverse events; 15 (17%) patients in the desmopressin and 16 (25%) patients in the placebo group. Most adverse events were mild. Serum sodium levels were <130 mmol/L in 10 (4%) patients and this occurred during dose-titration. Conclusions Orally administered desmopressin is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for nocturia in men.
In a case-control study with prevalence sampling, the authors explored the correlates for nocturia and their population-level impact. In 2003–2004, questionnaires were mailed to 6,000 subjects (aged 18–79 years) randomly identified from the Finnish Population Register (62.4% participated; 53.7% were female). Questionnaires contained items on medical conditions, medications, lifestyle, sociodemographic and reproductive factors, urinary symptoms, and snoring. Nocturia was defined as ≥2 voids/night. In age-adjusted analyses, factors associated with nocturia were entered into a multivariate model. Backward elimination was used to select variables for the final model, with adjustment for confounding. Although numerous correlates were identified, none affected ≥50% of nocturia cases of both sexes. The factors with the greatest impact at the population level were (urinary) urgency (attributable number/1,000 subjects (AN) = 24), benign prostatic hyperplasia (AN = 19), and snoring (AN = 16) for men and overweight and obesity (AN = 40), urgency (AN = 24), and snoring (AN = 17) for women. Moreover, correlates included prostate cancer and antidepressant use for men, coronary artery disease and diabetes for women, and restless legs syndrome and obesity for both sexes. Although several correlates were identified, none accounted for a substantial proportion of the population burden, highlighting the multifactorial etiology of nocturia.
Sphincteric incontinence is the most common urodynamic finding in patients with post-radical prostatectomy incontinence, although other findings may coexist. The most accurate diagnosis is attained when all objective measures are put in perspective with the clinical setting.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.