Contemporary cardiac intensive care units (CICUs) provide care for an aging and increasingly complex patient population. The medical complexity of this population is partly driven by an increased proportion of patients with respiratory failure needing noninvasive or invasive positive pressure ventilation (PPV). PPV often plays an important role in the management of patients with cardiogenic pulmonary edema, cardiogenic shock, or cardiac arrest, and those undergoing mechanical circulatory support. Noninvasive PPV, when appropriately applied to selected patients, may reduce the need for invasive mechanical PPV and improve survival. Invasive PPV can be lifesaving, but has both favorable and unfavorable interactions with left and right ventricular physiology and carries a risk of complications that influence CICU mortality. Effective implementation of PPV requires an understanding of the underlying cardiac and pulmonary pathophysiology. Cardiologists who practice in the CICU should be proficient with the indications, appropriate selection, potential cardiopulmonary interactions, and complications of PPV.
Evidence from prospective cohort studies indicates that a high consumption of predominantly plant-based foods, such as fruit and vegetables, nuts, and whole grains, is associated with a significantly lower risk of CVD. The protective effects of these foods are likely mediated through their multiple beneficial nutrients, including mono- and polyunsaturated fatty acids, omega-3 fatty acids, antioxidant vitamins, minerals, phytochemicals, fiber, and plant protein. In addition, minimizing intake of animal proteins has been shown to decrease the prevalence of CVD risk factors. Substantial evidence indicates that plant-based diets can play an important role in preventing and treating CVD and its risk factors. Such diets deserve more emphasis in dietary recommendations.
These cases support the hypothesis that thrombus formation may be a pathophysiological link between ischemic cerebral events and mitral annular calcification in some patients.
Background
Cardiovascular intensive care units (
CICUs
) have evolved from coronary care wards into distinct units for critically ill patients with primary cardiac diseases, often suffering from illnesses that cross multiple disciplines. Mounting evidence has demonstrated improved survival with the incorporation of dedicated
CICU
providers with expertise in critical care medicine (
CCM
). This is the first study to systematically survey dual certified physicians in order to assess the relevance of
CCM
training to contemporary
CICU
care.
Methods and Results
Utilizing American Board of Internal Medicine data through 2014, 397 eligible physicians had obtained initial certification in both cardiovascular disease and
CCM
. A survey to delineate the role of critical care training in the
CICU
was provided to these physicians. Among those surveyed, 120 physicians (30%) responded. Dual certified physicians reported frequent use of their
CCM
skills in the
CICU
, highlighting ventilator management, multiorgan dysfunction management, end‐of‐life care, and airway management. The majority (85%) cited these skills as the reason
CCM
training should be prioritized by future
CICU
providers. Few (17%) agreed that general cardiology fellowship alone is currently sufficient to care for patients in the modern
CICU
. Furthermore, there was a consensus that there is an unmet need for cardiologists trained in
CCM
(70%) and that
CICU
s should adopt a level system similar to trauma centers (61%).
Conclusions
Citing specific skills acquired during
CCM
training, dual certified critical care cardiologists reported that their additional critical care experience was necessary in their practice to effectively deliver care in the modern
CICU
.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.