Background: Overuse of head computed tomography (CT) for syncope has been reported. However, there is no literature synthesis on this overuse. We undertook a systematic review to determine the use and yield of head CT and risk factors for serious intracranial conditions among syncope patients. Methods:We searched Embase, Medline, and Cochrane databases from inception until June 2017. Studies including adult syncope patients with part or all of patients undergoing CT head were included. We excluded case reports, reviews, letters, and pediatric studies. Two independent reviewers screened the articles and collected data on CT head use, diagnostic yield (proportion with acute hemorrhage, tumors or infarct), and risk of bias. We report pooled percentages, I 2 , and Cochran's Q-test.Results: Seventeen articles with 3,361 syncope patients were included. In eight ED studies (n = 1,669), 54.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 34.9%-73.2%) received head CT with a 3.8% (95% CI = 2.6%-5.1%) diagnostic yield and considerable heterogeneity. In six in-hospital studies (n = 1,289), 44.8% (95% CI = 26.4%-64.1%) received head CT with a 1.2% (95% CI = 0.5%-2.2%) yield and no heterogeneity. In two articles, all patients had CT (yield 2.3%) and the third enrolled patients ≥ 65 years old (yield 7.7%). Abnormal neurologic findings, age ≥ 65 years, trauma, warfarin use, and seizure/stroke history were identified as risk factors. The quality of all articles referenced was strong.Conclusion: More than half of patients with syncope underwent CT head with a diagnostic yield of 1.1% to 3.8%. A future large prospective study is needed to develop a robust risk tool. S yncope is defined as a sudden and brief loss of consciousness (LOC) due to transient global cerebral hypoperfusion, followed by spontaneous and complete recovery. 1 It accounts for 1% to 3% of emergency department (ED) visits. 1-4 Among ED patients with syncope, 7% to 23% will have serious underlying conditions identified either in the ED or within 30 days of their index visit. 5-8 Previous studies have reported 2.3% to 4.4% incidence of serious intracranial conditions (subarachnoid hemorrhage, subdural hematoma, space-occupying lesion, or intraparenchymal infarct or hemorrhage) among

Background: Migraine is a common primary headache disorder diagnosed in the emergency department (ED). This systematic review sought to compare the efficacy of sodium valproate (SV) to dopamine antagonists (DA) in relieving pain due to acute migraine. Methods: Two research librarians helped create a search strategy including Embase, Ovid Medline, and the Cochrane Database of Clinical Trials from inception to June 1, 2020, updated May 19, 2021. Two investigators identified randomized control trials (RCTs) including adult patients with acute migraine presenting to the ED or acute clinical setting comparing SV to a DA with the aim of relieving pain. Primary outcome was headache relief at 1 hour from treatment. Secondary outcomes included pain relief at 24 hours, relief of associated symptoms (e.g. nausea, photo-/phonophobia, etc.), and need for rescue analgesia. Meta-analysis was performed and presented as odds ratios. Results: Four RCTs with 470 patients were identified from an initial pool of 454 titles. Two studies compared SV to a DA alone and two compared SV to a DA plus one other agent (sumatriptan or dihydroergotamine). Three studies were included for meta-analysis. Pain relief had a pooled odds ratio of 1.14 at 1 hour and 0.42 at 24 hours. Three articles reporting the need for rescue analgesia had pooled odds ratio of 2.76. Conclusions: Sodium valproate is not more effective than DA at reducing migraine headache pain at 1 hour and less effective at 24 hours. Dopamine antagonists should be used over SV for the management of patients with acute migraine.

The purpose of this study was to identify priorities for nursing research in a naval hospital using the Delphi technique. A general objective was to provide empirically based information to guide the development of a nursing research program at a regional medical treatment facility. Via a three-round Delphi survey, priority research questions were identified for the nursing department of a naval regional medical treatment facility. A serendipitous result was the identification of nursing research priorities within a deployed naval fleet hospital.

No abstract