Data availabilitySummary statistics generated by COVID-19 Host Genetics Initiative are available online (https://www.covid19hg.org/results/r6/). The analyses described here use the freeze 6 data. The COVID-19 Host Genetics Initiative continues to regularly release new data freezes. Summary statistics for samples from individuals of non-European ancestry are not currently available owing to the small individual sample sizes of these groups, but the results for 23 loci lead variants are reported in Supplementary Table 3. Individual-level data can be requested directly from the authors of the contributing studies, listed in Supplementary Table 1.
Large bone defects are ideally treated with autografts, which have many limitations. Therefore, osteoconductive scaffolds loaded with autologous bone marrow (BM) aspirate are increasingly used as alternatives. The purpose of this study was to compare the growth of multipotential stromal cells (MSCs) from unprocessed BM on a collagen‐containing bovine bone scaffold (Orthoss® Collagen) with a non‐collagen‐containing bovine bone scaffold, Orthoss®. Another collagen‐containing synthetic scaffold, Vitoss® was included in the comparison. Colonization of scaffolds by BM MSCs (n = 23 donors) was evaluated using microscopy, colony forming unit‐fibroblast assay and flow‐cytometry. The number of BM MSCs initially attached to Orthoss® Collagen and Vitoss® was similar but greater than Orthoss® (p = 0.001 and p = 0.041, respectively). Furthermore, the number of MSCs released from Orthoss® Collagen and Vitoss® after 2‐week culture was also higher compared to Orthoss® (p = 0.010 and p = 0.023, respectively). Interestingly, collagen‐containing scaffolds accommodated larger numbers of lymphocytic and myelomonocytic cells. Additionally, the proliferation of culture‐expanded MSCs on Orthoss® collagen and Vitoss® was greater compared to Orthoss® (p = 0.047 and p = 0.004, respectively). Collectively, collagen‐containing scaffolds were superior in supporting the attachment and proliferation of MSCs when they were loaded with unprocessed BM aspirates. This highlights the benefit of collagen incorporation into bone scaffolds for use with autologous bone marrow aspirates as autograft substitutes. © 2015 The Authors. Journal of Orthopaedic Research Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Orthopaedic Research Society. J Orthop Res 34:597–606, 2016.
This study investigates how mesenchymal stem cell's (MSCs) proliferation and migration abilities are influenced by various platelet products (PP). Donor‐matched, clinical‐, and control laboratory‐standard PPs were generated and assessed based on their platelet and leukocyte concentrations. Bone marrow derived MSCs were exposed to these PP to quantify their effect on in vitro MSC proliferation and migration. An adapted colony forming unit fibroblast (CFU‐F) assay was carried out on bone marrow aspirate using clinical‐standard PP‐loaded electrospun poly(ϵ‐caprolactone) (PCL) membrane to mimic future clinical applications to contain bone defects. Clinical‐standard PP had lower platelet (2.5 fold, p < 0.0001) and higher leukocyte (14.1 fold, p < 0.0001) concentrations compared to laboratory‐standard PP. It induced suboptimal MSC proliferation compared to laboratory‐standard PP and fetal calf serum (FCS). All PP induced significantly more MSC migration than FCS up to 24 h. The removal of leukocytes from PP had no effect on MSC proliferation or migration. The PP‐loaded membranes successfully supported MSC colony formation. This study indicates that platelet concentrations in PP impact MSC proliferation more than the presence of leukocytes, whilst MSC migration in response to PP is not influenced by platelet or leukocyte numbers. Clinical‐standard PP could be applied alongside manufactured membranes in the future treatment of bone reconstruction. © 2019 The Authors. Journal of Orthopaedic Research® Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Orthopaedic Research Society. J Orthop Res 37:1329–1338, 2019.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.