Purpose Certain patient demographics and biomarkers have been suggested to predict survival in patients infected with COVID-19. However, predictors of outcome in patients who are critically ill are unclear. Materials and Methods We performed a multicentre analysis of 171 consecutive patients with confirmed COVID-19 who were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) between 1 March 2020 and 30 April 2020 and were followed until 23 May 2020. Demographic data, past medical history, laboratory values, echocardiographic and telemetry data were analysed. Patient status was classified as either alive or deceased at hospital discharge or the end of follow-up period. Results Mean patient age was 66±13 and 57% were male. Mortality rate of this ICU cohort at the end of follow-up was 46.2%. A multivariable logistic regression analysis identified the presence or history of atrial fibrillation (Odds Ratio 4.8, p=0.004) as a significant cardiovascular attribute that contributed to increased mortality. Conclusion Mortality of critically ill COVID-19 patients is high. This study suggests a relationship between atrial fibrillation and increased mortality from COVID-19. Early aggressive treatment patients with high risk characteristics, such as atrial fibrillation could improve clinical outcome.

Context: Exertional rhabdomyolysis (ER) is a medical condition in which excessive and unaccustomed physical activity results in skeletal muscle damage in otherwise healthy individuals. Objective: To assess the overall outcomes of patients who presented to the emergency department with ER. Methods: This retrospective study was conducted across 4 hospitals. The study included nonpregnant adults with no history of renal function impairment or myopathy disorder who had a diagnosis of ER in the emergency department setting. Medical records were reviewed for patient demographics, length of stay, complications, mechanism(s) of injury involved, impact of nutritional supplements, spectrum of creatine kinase (CK) responses, prevalence of hospital readmissions, and overall mortality. Results: Of the 800 rhabdomyolysis cases identified during the 24-month study period, 41 were included in the study. The mean age was 29 years, and the patients were predominantly male (33 [80.5%]) and white (25 [61%]). The median length of stay was 2 days, and it correlated significantly with initial and peak CK levels (R=0.45, P=.004, and R=0.52, P<.001, respectively). Median initial and peak CK were noted to be 16,888 (range, 342-194,403) U/L and 18,534 (range, 342-287,565) U/L, respectively. Median discharge CK was 5287 (range, 10-61,617) U/L. The most commonly cited mechanism of injury was weight lifting (16 [39%]). In terms of overall outcomes, transient kidney injury was noted in 3 cases (7.4%), and no mortality was recorded during the admission or at 12 months of follow-up. Compartment syndrome or severe electrolyte abnormalities were not observed. There were only 2 uncomplicated readmissions (4.8%) due to high-intensity interval training. Conclusion: Hospitalized patients with ER without a history of renal impairment tend to have relatively low risks of complications and readmission.

Context Cases of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) exacerbations continue to affect patients' quality of life and cause significant financial burden on our healthcare system. Objective To identify risk factors for readmission in patients discharged with a diagnosis of HFpEF. Methods Electronic health records of patients over 18 years of age with a primary diagnosis of HFpEF treated between August 1, 2017 and March 1, 2018 in a community hospital were retrospectively reviewed. The study population included patients with HFpEF greater than 40% who were screened but did not qualify for the ongoing CONNECT- HF trial being conducted by Duke Clinical Research. To be included, subjects had to fall into 1 of 2 classifications (NYHA Class II-IV or ACC/AHA Stage B-D) and have a life expectancy greater than 6 months. Patients were excluded if they had terminal illness other than HF, a prior heart transplant or were on a transplant list, a current or planned placement of a left ventricular assist device, chronic kidney disease requiring hemodialysis, inability to use mobile applications, or inability to participate in longitudinal follow up. Readmission rate was analyzed at 30 and 90 days along with patients’ demographics and associated comorbidities, including peripheral vascular disease, anemia, pulmonary hypertension, arrythmia, and valvular heart disease. Patients were risk stratified using the LACE index readmission score and the Charlson comorbidity index. Results Of the 492 cases of HFpEF identified during the 7-month study period, 212 patients were included. The majority of patients were women (126; 59.4%), had a median body mass index above 30 kg/m2 (123; 58%), and had pulmonary hypertension (94; 44.3%), anemia (146; 68.8%), and arrhythmia (101, 47.6%). Forty-five (21.2%) patients were readmitted for HFpEF within 90 days of initial discharge; 32 of those (71.1%) were readmitted within 30 days of initial discharge. Patients with higher LACE and Charlson comorbidity index scores were more likely to be readmitted within 90 days. Peripheral vascular disease (P=.002), tricuspid regurgitation (P=.001), pulmonary hypertension (P=.049), and anemia (P=.029) were risk factors associated with readmissions. Use of ACEi/ARBs (P=.017) was associated with fewer readmissions. Conclusion Anemia, peripheral vascular disease, pulmonary hypertension, and valvular heart disease are not only postulated mechanisms of HFpEF, but also important risk factors for readmission. These study findings affirm the need for continued research of the pathophysiology and associated comorbidities of the HFpEF population to improve quality of life and lower healthcare costs.

The presence of at least one underlying chronic health condition, such as long-term care facility residence, malnutrition, immunosuppression, or prosthetic device use, are well known factors increasing infection risks and progression to severe sepsis. Furthermore, some degree of cardiovascular dysfunction occurs in the majority of septic patients and this prognostic significance has become increasingly recognized. Since septic shock carries the highest mortality risk on the sepsis spectrum, it is important to evaluate the cardiovascular risk impact on mortality in this subset of patients. METHODS METHODS The retrospective parent study contributing these electronic health record data was IRB approved and conducted across four hospital intensive care units within the authors' Michigan healthcare system. Patients with cardiopulmonary arrest or transfers from an outside facility were excluded. The authors evaluated the presence of modifiable and non-modifiable cardiovascular risk factors in septic shock patients upon admission to an emergency department. RESULTS RESULTS The authors' final analytic sample included n = 109 adults who were discharged alive compared to those who died during hospitalization. Those patients who died were more often male with an underlying history of hypertension, congestive heart failure, coronary artery disease, or peripheral arterial diseases, were taking pre-admission beta-blocker medications, and had higher APACHE II scores at admission compared to the patients who survived to discharge. Significantly higher mortality risks were found in sample patients with increased troponin levels on admission and atrial fibrillation. CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS Appropriate triage and prompt treatment of these patient groups with tailored therapy to stabilize and improve cardiac dysfunction in the emergency department could potentially lead to improved survival outcomes. Clinicians need more studies to determine therapeutic targets most impacting underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms such as elevated troponin and atrial fibrillation that greatly increase mortality risks.

Background Aortic stenosis is a progressive disease that frequently remains undiagnosed until late in the disease course. In patients that present with symptoms of heart failure and a systolic murmur at a young age, a congenital valvular abnormality must be on the differential. With patients that have accelerated symptoms of aortic stenosis and valvular dysfunction, a unicuspid aortic valve (UAV) could be present. A UAV is often difficult to distinguish from a bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) on transthoracic echocardiography. In patients with congenital valvular abnormalities an ascending aortic aneurysm can also be present. Aortic stenosis changes the jet of fluid emerging from the aortic valve leading to an increased risk for aortic aneurysm dissection and rupture. The gold standard treatment for aortic stenosis secondary to a congenital valvular abnormality is valve replacement. A known risk of aortic valve replacement is conduction abnormalities. In this case, we present a patient with a unicuspid valve who postoperatively develops complete heart block leading to pacemaker implantation. Case summary We present a case of a 46-year-old Caucasian male with no prior medical history who presented with progressively worsening exertional dyspnoea and palpitations for 7 months. Transthoracic echocardiogram showed a BAV, however, further work up confirmed a unicommissural aortic valve with severe aortic stenosis and moderate regurgitation along with an ascending aortic aneurysm. Aortic valve replacement and aortic aneurysm repair via the Bentall procedure was successfully completed with postoperative course being complicated by a complete heart block and subsequent permanent pacemaker placement. Discussion When assessing patients with symptoms of heart failure with a systolic murmur that suggests aortic stenosis at a young age, a UAV must be kept on the differential. The symptoms of aortic stenosis and valvular dysfunction are accelerated in UAVs when compared with BAVs. Currently, the treatment for patients with congenital valvular abnormalities presenting with aortic stenosis is aortic valve replacement using traditional open surgery. A known sequelae of isolated aortic valve replacement is conduction abnormalities that can sometimes lead to permanent pacemaker placement. After the confirmation of unicuspid or bicuspid valve postoperatively, it is important to report any postoperative conduction abnormalities. This is because, currently, there is no literature that compares the incidence of conduction abnormalities after unicuspid replacement to that of other BAV syndromes.