Separating microplastics (MPs) from
environmental samples is challenging,
but necessary to determine their environmental prevalence. Current
methods are not standardized across environmental sample type, and
it is unclear how well they recover smaller sized MPs. In response,
we developed a method that extracts plastics magnetically, taking
advantage of their hydrophobic surface to magnetize the plastics.
We created hydrophobic Fe nanoparticles that bind to plastic, allowing
magnetic recovery. With this principle applied to a simple method,
we recovered 92% of 10–20 μm polyethylene and polystyrene
beads and 93% of >1 mm MPs (polyethylene, polyethylene terephthalate,
polystyrene, polyurethane, polyvinyl chloride, and polypropylene)
from seawater. We also recovered 84% and 78% of MPs (polyethylene,
polystyrene, polyurethane, polyvinyl chloride, and polypropylene)
ranging from 200 μm to 1 mm from freshwater and sediments,
respectively. Overall, the procedure is efficient for various sizes,
polymer types, and sample matrices and can be considered by researchers
to be included as a step of the extraction procedure for MPs (i.e.,
post density separation) or stand-alone for cleaner samples (i.e.,
drinking water).
Stormwater runoff has been suggested to be a significant pathway of microplastics to aquatic habitats; yet, few studies have quantified microplastics in stormwater. Here, we quantify and characterize urban stormwater runoff from 12 watersheds surrounding San Francisco Bay for anthropogenic debris, including microplastics. Depth-integrated samples were collected during wet weather events. All stormwater runoff contained anthropogenic microparticles, including microplastics, with concentrations ranging from 1.1 to 24.6 particles/L. These concentrations are much higher than those in wastewater treatment plant effluent, suggesting urban stormwater runoff is a major source of anthropogenic debris, including microplastics, to aquatic habitats. Fibers and black rubbery fragments (potentially tire and road wear particles) were the most frequently occurring morphologies, comprising ∼85% of all particles across all samples. This suggests that mitigation strategies for stormwater should be prioritized. As a case study, we sampled stormwater from the inlet and outlet of a rain garden during three storm events to measure how effectively rain gardens capture microplastics and prevent it from contaminating aquatic ecosystems. We found that the rain garden successfully removed 96% of anthropogenic debris on average and 100% of black rubbery fragments, suggesting rain gardens should be further explored as a mitigation strategy for microplastic pollution.
The physical and chemical properties of microplastics and their environmental distributions may provide clues about their sources and inform their fate. We demonstrate the value of extensive monitoring of microplastics in an urban bay, San Francisco Bay. Surface water, fish, sediment, stormwater runoff, and treated wastewater were sampled across the bay and adjacent national marine sanctuaries (NMS). We found microplastics and other anthropogenic microdebris ("microdebris") in all sample types. Concentrations were higher in the bay than in the NMS, and within the bay, concentrations were higher during the wet season than during the dry season. The fate of microdebris varied depending on their morphologies and densities: fibers were dominant in fish, black rubbery fragments were common in sediment, as were fibers, while buoyant fragments and fibers were widely observed in surface waters. Notably, we found large amounts of black rubbery fragments, an emerging contaminant, in stormwater. Moreover, stormwater was a significant pathway of microdebris, with concentrations roughly 140 times greater than those found in wastewater, which was dominated by fibers. Overall, we demonstrate the value of multimatrix regional monitoring to evaluate the sources and fate of microplastics, which can inform effective mitigation for other urban bays around the world.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.