Using 2008 Afrobarometer survey data, we examine the relationship between religion and subjective well-being (SWB) in Ghana, as well as religious group differences in their experiences of SWB. Two measures of religion-religious affiliation and religious importance, and two measures of SWB-absolute SWB (own perceived living conditions) and relative SWB (own living conditions compared to those of other Ghanaians) are employed in this study. Results show that religious affiliation is significantly related to both measures of SWB although associations depicted for such relationships were not strong. Religious importance significantly related to relative SWB only (with a weak-to-moderate association). Significant religious affiliation and religious importance group differences are found on both SWB outcomes via non-parametric test procedures (Kruskal-Wallis H test, followed by post hoc tests). On balance, the None/Traditional religious group experienced less favorable SWB than Other Christian, Evangelical/Pentecostal, and Muslim groups, especially for absolute SWB, while the None/Traditional group experienced particularly less favorable relative SWB than the Protestant group. Religious importance groups also significantly differed in such a way that the group that considered religion very important had more favorable experiences of both types of SWB than the group that considered religion not at all/not very important. Other significant differences on both outcomes are found among ethnic, educational, and regional groups. In view of the findings, the study contributes to SWB research and suggests policy implications.

Ethnicity, Micro and macro-levels, Economic reforms, Perceived and actual economic well-being, Ethnic-specific programs,

No abstract

We investigated the extent to which methodological concerns explicitly addressed by the designers of the World Mental Health Surveys persist in the results that were obtained using the WMH-CIDI instrument. We compared rates of endorsement of mental illness symptoms in the United States (very high) and Nepal (very low) as they were affected by respondent understanding of the survey, social desirability bias, interview social context and translation-related sources of misunderstanding. The results showed that, although levels of misunderstanding and social desirability were higher in Nepal than in the U.S., these potential methodological concerns had less effect on symptom endorsement in Nepal than in the U.S. In Nepal non-methodological factors related to the socio-cultural context probably had a more substantial impact on observed symptom rates than did the methodological factors. The larger issue is the effect that methodological factors have on the validity of reported rates of disorder. Keywords Measurement . Psychiatric disorder . ReliabilitySince the publication of the Global Burden of Disease study (Murray and Lopez 1996) and its conclusion that mental disorders are both prevalent and disabling, there has been a sustained interest in understanding the true extent of this problem. The estimates provided in that study were based on research findings that used different techniques for assessing disorder, different types of and sized samples and different spectrums of disorder. To rectify these problems investigators have attempted to employ more careful means for assessing disorders and for obtaining information from better samples of populations. Easily the most ambitious of these attempts is the World Mental Health Surveys (WMH) project that has employed a carefully constructed version of the Composite International Diagnostic

No abstract