Tau protein plays an important role in the biology of stress granules and in the stress response of neurons, but the nature of these biochemical interactions is not known. Here we show that the interaction of tau with RNA and the RNA binding protein TIA1 is sufficient to drive phase separation of tau at physiological concentrations, without the requirement for artificial crowding agents such as polyethylene glycol (PEG). We further show that phase separation of tau in the presence of RNA and TIA1 generates abundant tau oligomers. Prior studies indicate that recombinant tau readily forms oligomers and fibrils in vitro in the presence of polyanionic agents, including RNA, but the resulting tau aggregates are not particularly toxic. We discover that tau oligomers generated during copartitioning with TIA1 are significantly more toxic than tau aggregates generated by incubation with RNA alone or phase-separated tau complexes generated by incubation with artificial crowding agents. This pathway identifies a potentially important source for generation of toxic tau oligomers in tau-related neurodegenerative diseases. Our results also reveal a general principle that phase-separated RBP droplets provide a vehicle for coassortment of selected proteins. Tau selectively copartitions with TIA1 under physiological conditions, emphasizing the importance of TIA1 for tau biology. Other RBPs, such as G3BP1, are able to copartition with tau, but this happens only in the presence of crowding agents. This type of selective mixing might provide a basis through which membraneless organelles bring together functionally relevant proteins to promote particular biological activities.

Mutations in a number of stress granule-associated proteins have been linked to various neurodegenerative diseases. Several of these mutations are found in aggregation-prone prion-like domains (PrLDs) within these proteins. In this work, we examine the sequence features governing PrLD localization to stress granules upon stress. We demonstrate that many yeast PrLDs are sufficient for stress-induced assembly into microscopically visible foci that colocalize with stress granule markers. Additionally, compositional biases exist among PrLDs that assemble upon stress, and these biases are consistent across different stressors. Using these biases, we have developed a composition-based prediction method that accurately predicts PrLD assembly into foci upon heat shock. We show that compositional changes alter PrLD assembly behavior in a predictable manner, while scrambling primary sequence has little effect on PrLD assembly and recruitment to stress granules. Furthermore, we were able to design synthetic PrLDs that were efficiently recruited to stress granules, and found that aromatic amino acids, which have previously been linked to PrLD phase separation, were dispensable for this recruitment. These results highlight the flexible sequence requirements for stress granule recruitment and suggest that PrLD localization to stress granules is driven primarily by amino acid composition, rather than primary sequence.

Stress granules are membraneless protein- and mRNA-rich organelles that form in response to perturbations in environmental conditions. Stress granule formation is reversible, and persistent stress granules have been implicated in a variety of neurodegenerative disorders, including amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. However, characterization of the factors involved in dissolving stress granules is incomplete. Many stress granule proteins contain prion-like domains (PrLDs), some of which have been linked to stress granule formation. Here, we demonstrate that the PrLD-containing yeast protein kinase Sky1 is a stress granule component. Sky1 is recruited to stress granules in part via its PrLD, and Sky1’s kinase activity regulates timely stress granule disassembly during stress recovery. This effect is mediated by phosphorylation of the stress granule component Npl3. Sky1 can compensate for defects in chaperone-mediated stress granule disassembly and vice-versa, demonstrating that cells have multiple overlapping mechanisms for re-solubilizing stress granule components.

bMultiple yeast prions have been identified that result from the structural conversion of proteins into a self-propagating amyloid form. Amyloid-based prion activity in yeast requires a series of discrete steps. First, the prion protein must form an amyloid nucleus that can recruit and structurally convert additional soluble proteins. Subsequently, maintenance of the prion during cell division requires fragmentation of these aggregates to create new heritable propagons. For the Saccharomyces cerevisiae prion protein Sup35, these different activities are encoded by different regions of the Sup35 prion domain. An N-terminal glutamine/ asparagine-rich nucleation domain is required for nucleation and fiber growth, while an adjacent oligopeptide repeat domain is largely dispensable for prion nucleation and fiber growth but is required for chaperone-dependent prion maintenance. Although prion activity of glutamine/asparagine-rich proteins is predominantly determined by amino acid composition, the nucleation and oligopeptide repeat domains of Sup35 have distinct compositional requirements. Here, we quantitatively define these compositional requirements in vivo. We show that aromatic residues strongly promote both prion formation and chaperone-dependent prion maintenance. In contrast, nonaromatic hydrophobic residues strongly promote prion formation but inhibit prion propagation. These results provide insight into why some aggregation-prone proteins are unable to propagate as prions. Misfolding of a wide range of proteins leads to formation of amyloid fibrils, which are ordered, ␤-sheet-rich protein aggregates. Many human diseases are associated with the formation of amyloid fibrils, including Alzheimer's disease, type II diabetes, and the transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSEs) (1). However, only a small subset of amyloids are infectious (called prions), including the causative agents of TSEs in mammals (2-4) and, and others in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (5-9).Most of the known yeast prion proteins contain glutamine/ asparagine (Q/N)-rich domains that drive amyloid formation. Q/N-rich domains are found in 1 to 4% of the proteins in most eukaryotic proteomes (10), but very few of these proteins have been shown to undergo amyloid structural conversion. Bioinformatics screens for prions in yeast have had some notable successes (reviewed in reference 11); however, despite advances in predicting which Q/N-rich domains may turn out to be bona fide prions (12, 13), predictions remain imperfect.A well-studied model prion from yeast (S. cerevisiae) is [PSI ϩ ], the prion form of the translational terminator protein Sup35 (5). Like other yeast prion proteins, Sup35 is modular, as it contains a distinct prion-forming domain (PFD), middle domain (M), and C-terminal domain (C) (Fig. 1A) (14-17). The PFD (amino acids 1 to 114) drives the conversion of Sup35 into its amyloid form (15), the charged M domain has no known function other than its ability to stabilize [PSI ϩ ] fibers, and the C domain is an essential component resp...