Objective:
To evaluate the association of perioperative ctDNA dynamics on outcomes after hepatectomy for CLM.
Summary Background Data:
Prognostication is imprecise for patients undergoing hepatectomy for CLM, and ctDNA is a promising biomarker. However, clinical implications of perioperative ctDNA dynamics are not well established.
Methods:
Patients underwent curative-intent hepatectomy after preoperative chemotherapy for CLM (2013–2017) with paired prehepatectomy/postoperative ctDNA analyses via plasma-only assay. Positivity was determined using a proprietary variant classifier. Primary endpoint was recurrence-free survival (RFS). Median follow-up was 55 months.
Results:
Forty-eight patients were included. ctDNA was detected before and after surgery (ctDNA+/+) in 14 (29%), before but not after surgery (ctDNA+/−) in 19 (40%), and not at all (ctDNA−/−) in 11 (23%). Adverse tissue somatic mutations were detected in TP53 (n = 26; 54%), RAS (n = 23; 48%), SMAD4 (n = 5; 10%), FBXW7 (n = 3; 6%), and BRAF (n = 2; 4%). ctDNA+/+ was associated with worse RFS (median: ctDNA+/+, 6.0 months; ctDNA+/−, not reached; ctDNA−/−, 33.0 months; P = 0.001). Compared to ctDNA+/+, ctDNA+/− was associated with improved RFS [hazard ratio (HR) 0.24 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.1–0.58)] and overall survival [HR 0.24 (95% CI 0.08–0.74)]. Adverse somatic mutations were not associated with survival. After adjustment for prehepatectomy chemotherapy, synchronous disease, and ≥2 CLM, ctDNA+/− and ctDNA−/− were independently associated with improved RFS compared to ctDNA+/+ (ctDNA+/−: HR 0.21, 95% CI 0.08–0.53; ctDNA−/−: HR 0.21, 95% CI 0.08–0.56).
Conclusions:
Perioperative ctDNA dynamics are associated with survival, identify patients with high recurrence risk, and may be used to guide treatment decisions and surveillance after hepatectomy for patients with CLM.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.