Introduction Staged, tissue expander-based implant reconstruction continues to be the most common mode of breast reconstruction after mastectomy and has evolved significantly for the past 60 years. Prepectoral acellular dermal matrix (ADM)-assisted breast reconstruction is gaining popularity with complication rates similar to total submuscular and ADM-assisted partially submuscular reconstruction. Ours is among the first reports comparing postoperative pain and early functional outcomes between 2-stage ADM-assisted prepectoral and partial submuscular breast reconstruction. Methods Patients reconstructed with a 2-stage, ADM-assisted prepectoral approach were case matched with patients who had undergone ADM-assisted, partial submuscular reconstruction. Demographics and complication rates were compared. Primary outcomes included postoperative pain, number of days until full active shoulder range of motion was achieved, and postoperative days until drain removal. Results Forty-five breasts among 24 patients were reconstructed with ADM-assisted prepectoral tissue expanders after mastectomy and 90 breasts among 48 patients were reconstructed with ADM-assisted partial submuscular placement. There was a similarly acceptable complication profile between the 2 groups. The prepectoral group had significantly lower inpatient pain scores, required significantly less intravenous opioids and less oral opioids as outpatients. The prepectoral group saw a return to full active range of shoulder motion in half the number days of the partial submuscular group. Drain duration was similar between groups. Conclusions Prepectoral ADM-assisted breast reconstruction can be performed safely and with significantly less pain and earlier return to function than partial submuscular expander placement. Expander placement exclusively in the prepectoral pocket did not result in increased drain duration while affording patients the benefits of avoiding surgical elevation of the pectoralis muscle.

Our evidence-based protocol was associated with a significant decline in infection rates among implant-based breast reconstruction patients and was particularly effective for gram-positive infections. We will continue to use this protocol in our practice and will consider future directions for addressing gram-negative infections as well.

Introduction The obese or ptotic breast demonstrates significant difficulty in breast reconstruction after mastectomy with increased rates of perioperative complications compared with the general population, regardless of reconstruction type. Implant-based reconstruction in this patient population with the traditional horizontal elliptical skin-sparing mastectomy tends to have aesthetically displeasing qualities secondary to skin flap redundancy and blunting of the breast contour. Wise-pattern closures have been described with submuscular direct-to-implant and 2-stage reconstructions, with more favorable complication profile when staged. Our study aims to report outcomes and safety of a prepectoral 2-stage wise-pattern closure technique in the obese and/or ptotic population. Methods A retrospective chart review was performed to identify all overweight, obese, and/or grade III ptotic patients who have undergone a 2-stage, wise-pattern skin closure with prepectoral placement of tissue expander by a single surgeon. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and perioperative descriptors were reported. Delayed wound healing, infection, seroma formation, and explantation or reoperation were recorded for each patient involved in the study. Results Thirty-seven obese and/or ptotic breasts among 21 patients underwent immediate prepectoral tissue expander placement with wise-pattern skin reduction closure with mean body mass index of 35.3 kg/m2, and 25% of patients were diabetic The most common complication rates by breast were seroma formation (50%) and wound/dehiscence at T-point (28.6%), which all ultimately healed with intervention as described. One major (2.7%) and 1 minor (2.7%) infection were successfully treated with antibiotics. There were no cases of implant exposure. Two operative complex repairs and 1 elective explantation were performed. Diabetes and increasing body mass index were statistically associated with an increased overall perioperative complication rate. Conclusions Prepectoral, 2-stage breast reconstruction with wise-pattern skin reduction performs well in obese and/or ptotic patients with favorable rates of perioperative complications. Wound dehiscence was prevalent but managed with wound care when complex repair was not required to expedite adjuvant chemotherapy. Infection rates and reoperation rates were low, and all patients reported positive aesthetic results at the completion of reconstruction.