STUDY QUESTIONDoes the type of luteal support affect pregnancy outcomes in recipients of vitrified blastocysts?SUMMARY ANSWERLuteal support with vaginal progesterone gel or i.m. progesterone (IMP) results in comparable implantation and pregnancy rates in IVF patients receiving vitrified blastocysts.WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADYIn fresh IVF cycles, both IMP and vaginal progesterone have become the standard of care for luteal phase support. Due to conflicting data in replacement cycles, IMP is often considered to be the standard of care.STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATIONRetrospective analysis of 920 frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles between 1 January 2010 and 1 September 2012.PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODSPatients from a large, private practice undergoing autologous and donor FET using IMP or vaginal progesterone gel for luteal support were included in the analysis. IMP was used for luteal support in 682 FET cycles and vaginal progesterone gel was used in 238 FET cycles. Standard clinical outcomes of positive serum hCG levels, implantation, clinical pregnancy, spontaneous abortion and live birth were reported.MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCEThe IMP and vaginal progesterone gel groups had similar patient demographics for all characteristics assessed. Implantation rates (46.4 versus 45.6%, P = 0.81), clinical pregnancy rates (61.7 versus 60.5%, P = 0.80) and live birth rates (49.1 versus 48.9%, P > 0.99) were not significantly different between IMP and vaginal progesterone gel, respectively.LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTIONThis study is limited by its retrospective design and by its lack of randomization to the type of luteal support. In addition, because no a priori expected rates of success could be provided for this retrospective investigation, it was not possible to estimate statistical power associated with the various outcomes presented.WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGSWith the recent trends toward single embryo transfer (SET) and use of vitrified blastocysts in FET cycles, our data with ∼40% of cycles being SET and use of exclusively vitrified blastocysts are more relevant to current practices than previous studies.STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)Support for data collection and analysis was provided by Actavis, Inc. D.S. has received honoraria for lectures and participation in Scientific Advisory Boards for Actavis, Inc. J.P. is an employee of Actavis, Inc. N.E. has received payment from Actavis, Inc., for her time for data collection. H.H. has received payment from Actavis, Inc., for statistical analyses. Z.P.N. has nothing to disclose.
4054 Poster Board III-989 Introduction Many clinical situations are associated with the development of iron deficiency which can adversely affect energy level, physical activity, cardiovascular function, cognition, and immune responses. Oral iron, which is the primary treatment for iron deficiency, is limited by poor tolerability due to gastrointestinal (GI) side effects and resulting problems with compliance. In addition, in many patients it is not easily absorbed and does not replace iron stores rapidly enough to meet iron losses. Blood transfusions may be avoided in these patients with the use of intravenous (IV) iron. Whereas other forms of IV iron require multiple doses for complete replacement, LMWID may be administered as a total dose infusion, typically over a 4 to 6 hour period. LMWID (INFeD) is the preferred iron dextran due to the lower incidence of reported adverse reactions in the literature as compared to high (H) MWID, (DexFerrum). Numerous clinical studies of IV iron suggest that 1000 mg is an adequate dose for many patients. Our clinical practice routinely administers LMWID as a 1 g infusion over 1 hour without pre-medication. We summarize our experience with the safety and efficacy of this method of administration. Patients and Methods Data were collected for consecutive adult patients with iron deficiency who were treated with 1 gram of LMWID from August 2008 to May 2009. To avoid confounding variables patients who received erythropoiesis stimulating agents or chemotherapy were excluded from the analysis. Age, gender, height, weight, diagnosis, tests of iron status (serum ferritin, total iron binding capacity, serum iron, and percent transferrin saturation), hemoglobin (Hb), history of multiple drug allergies and/or iron allergies, dose of iron dextran, infusion rate, number of transfusions, and signs or reports of adverse reactions were recorded. As clinically important hypophosphatemia (serum phosphate <2mg/dL) has been reported with several IV iron preparations, we examined pre- and post-infusion phosphate levels. Results 189 consecutive iron deficient patients (84% female, 76% white, mean age = 51 years, mean weight = 85 Kg) were included in the analysis, 15.9% of whom had multiple drug allergies (≥ 2). The most common diagnoses were: menorrhagia, chronic kidney disease, angiodysplasia, pregnancy, GI bleed, and gastric bypass; 19% of patients had multiple diagnoses. A total of 224 1-gram doses were administered over a median infusion time of 63 minutes (interquartile range 60-66 min). No pre-medication was administered except for 1 dose of methylprednisolone prior to the test dose in each of 2 patients: one with a previous reaction to HMWID, and one with drug allergies. Following administration of LMWID, there was a significant increase from baseline in Hb of 1.2 g/dL (p <0.0001, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.0 to 1.4) with a median follow-up time of 3 weeks. A follow-up time of ≥ 4 weeks was associated with a greater increase in Hb than < 4 weeks (1.5 vs 1.0 g/dL, p=0.013). One patient required a transfusion following severe GI bleeding secondary to angiodysplasia. Nineteen patients (10.1%) experienced 33 adverse events (AEs). The AEs were considered treatment-related in12 patients (6.3%). The most common AEs were back pain (2.6%), headache (2.1%), and nausea (1.6%). AEs were mostly transient and resolved without therapy. Five (2.6%) patients were treated for minor reactions (3 patients received 125 milligrams of methylprednisolone during or immediately following the infusion, and 2 patients received acetaminophen). There were no serious AEs, and only 1 patient discontinued treatment due to an AE (hives). The only demographic factor that was independently associated with an increased likelihood of experiencing an AE was drug allergies. Patients with a history of > 2 drug allergies were 4.3 times more likely to experience any kind of AE than other patients (95% CI: 1.1 to 16.3, p=0.031). Mean change from baseline phosphate level was 0.0 mg/dL (95% CI: -0.1 to 0.2, p=0.537) at a median follow-up time of two weeks. No patient developed hypophosphatemia. Conclusions Our single center experience found IV administration of 1 gram of LMWID over 1 hour is a safe and effective treatment for patients with iron deficiency with the advantages of shorter treatment period, assured compliance, and a lower incidence of side effects than oral iron. Future prospective, randomized studies will help confirm these findings. Disclosures: Off Label Use: The total dose infusion of low molecular weight iron dextran, although widely used, is an off label method of administration of intravenous iron. Pappadakis:Watson Laboratories: Employment. Dahl:Watson Laboratories: Employment.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.