The maximum size of organisms has increased enormously since the initial appearance of life >3.5 billion years ago (Gya), but the pattern and timing of this size increase is poorly known. Consequently, controls underlying the size spectrum of the global biota have been difficult to evaluate. Our period-level compilation of the largest known fossil organisms demonstrates that maximum size increased by 16 orders of magnitude since life first appeared in the fossil record. The great majority of the increase is accounted for by 2 discrete steps of approximately equal magnitude: the first in the middle of the Paleoproterozoic Era (Ϸ1.9 Gya) and the second during the late Neoproterozoic and early Paleozoic eras (0.6 -0.45 Gya). Each size step required a major innovation in organismal complexity-first the eukaryotic cell and later eukaryotic multicellularity. These size steps coincide with, or slightly postdate, increases in the concentration of atmospheric oxygen, suggesting latent evolutionary potential was realized soon after environmental limitations were removed.body size ͉ Cambrian ͉ oxygen ͉ Precambrian ͉ trend D espite widespread scientific and popular fascination with the largest and smallest organisms and numerous studies of body size evolution within individual taxonomic groups (1-9), the first-order pattern of body size evolution through the history of life has not been quantified rigorously. Because size influences (and may be limited by) a broad spectrum of physiological, ecological, and evolutionary processes (10-16), detailed documentation of size trends may shed light on the constraints and innovations that have shaped life's size spectrum over evolutionary time as well as the role of the body size spectrum in structuring global ecosystems. Bonner (17) presented a figure portraying a gradual, monotonic increase in the overall maximum size of living organisms over the past 3.5 billion years. The pattern appears consistent with a simple, continuous underlying process such as diffusion (18), but could also reflect a more complex process. Bonner, for example, proposed that lineages evolve toward larger sizes to exploit unoccupied ecological niches. For decades, Bonner's has been the only attempt to quantify body size evolution over the entire history of life on Earth, but the data he presented were not tied to particular fossil specimens and were plotted without consistent controls on taxonomic scale against a nonlinear timescale. Hence, we have lacked sufficient data on the tempo and mode of maximum size change to evaluate potential first-order biotic and abiotic controls on organism size through the history of life.Here, we document the evolutionary history of body size on Earth, focusing on the upper limit to size. Use of maximum size allows us to assess constraints on the evolution of large body size and avoids the more substantial empirical difficulties in determining mean, median, or minimum size for all life or even for many individual taxa. For each era within the Archean Eon (4,000-2,500 Mya) and ...

The high concentration of molecular oxygen in Earth's atmosphere is arguably the most conspicuous and geologically important signature of life. Earth's early atmosphere lacked oxygen; accumulation began after the evolution of oxygenic photosynthesis in cyanobacteria around 3.0-2.5 billion years ago (Gya). Concentrations of oxygen have since varied, first reaching near-modern values ~600 million years ago (Mya). These fluctuations have been hypothesized to constrain many biological patterns, among them the evolution of body size. Here, we review the state of knowledge relating oxygen availability to body size. Laboratory studies increasingly illuminate the mechanisms by which organisms can adapt physiologically to the variation in oxygen availability, but the extent to which these findings can be extrapolated to evolutionary timescales remains poorly understood. Experiments confirm that animal size is limited by experimental hypoxia, but show that plant vegetative growth is enhanced due to

The Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) has a long history of use in educational psychology, yet few studies have examined the latent factor structure of the entire scale using data from a single administration of the instrument. Although using the subscales individually was encouraged by the creators of the instrument, the practice has produced piecemeal evidence for the latent factor structure. In the current study, we administered all 15 subscales of the MSLQ to a large population of postsecondary students enrolled in introductory geoscience courses and used confirmatory factor analysis to examine the latent factor structures described in previous MSLQ literature. Faced with unsatisfactory evidence for the hypothesized structures, we describe our respecification process and provide some commentary on a more parsimonious latent factor structure that may be of use in similar research projects.

This paper is published under the terms of the CC-BY-NC license.

No abstract