The specific mechanisms underlying general anesthesia are primarily unknown. The intravenous general anesthetic etomidate acts by potentiating GABA(A) receptors, with selectivity for beta2 and beta3 subunit-containing receptors determined by a single asparagine residue. We generated a genetically modified mouse containing an etomidate-insensitive beta2 subunit (beta2 N265S) to determine the role of beta2 and beta3 subunits in etomidate-induced anesthesia. Loss of pedal withdrawal reflex and burst suppression in the electroencephalogram were still observed in the mutant mouse, indicating that loss of consciousness can be mediated purely through beta3-containing receptors. The sedation produced by subanesthetic doses of etomidate and during recovery from anesthesia was present only in wild-type mice, indicating that the beta2 subunit mediates the sedative properties of anesthetics. These findings show that anesthesia and sedation are mediated by distinct GABA(A) receptor subtypes.

Neurones in the superior colliculus (SC) respond to novel sensory stimuli and response habituation is a key feature of this. It is known that both ionotropic and metabotropic glutamate (mGlu) receptors participate in visual responses of superficial SC neurones. A feature of Group II and Group III mGlu receptors is that they may modulate specific neural pathways, possibly via presynaptic mechanisms. However, less is known about how this may relate to functions of systems in whole animals. We have therefore investigated whether these receptors affect specific attributes of visual responses in the superficial SC. Recordings were made from visually responsive neurones in anaesthetised rats, and agonists and antagonists of Group II and III mGlu receptors were applied iontophoretically at the recording site. We found that application of the Group III metabotropic glutamate receptor agonist l‐2‐amino‐4‐phosphonobutyric acid (l‐AP4) produced an increase in visual response habituation, whilst Group III antagonists decreased habituation. These effects were independent of the response habituation mediated via GABAB receptors. In contrast, modulation of Group II mGlu receptors with the specific agonist LY354740 or the antagonist LY341495 did not affect response habituation, although these compounds did modulate visual responses. This suggests a specific role for Group III mGlu receptors in visual response habituation. The magnitude of Group II effects was smaller during presentation of low contrast stimuli compared with high contrast stimuli. This suggests that activation of Group II receptors may be activity dependent and that these receptors can translate this into a functional effect in adapting to high contrast stimuli.

Group I metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) are expressed in cells in the superficial layers of the rat superior colliculus (SSC) and SSC afferents. The purpose of this study was to investigate the physiological effect of Group I mGluR activation on visual responses of SSC neurones using both in vivo and in vitro techniques. In the in vivo preparation, agonists and antagonists were applied by iontophoresis and single neurone activity was recorded extracellularly in anaesthetised rats. Application of the Group I agonist (S)‐3,5‐dihydroxyphenylglycine (DHPG) resulted in a reversible inhibition of the visual response. The effect of DHPG could be blocked by concurrent application of the Group I (mGluR1/mGluR5) antagonist (S)‐4‐carboxyphenylglycine (4CPG) or mGluR1 antagonist (+)‐2‐methyl‐4‐carboxyphenylglycine (LY367385). Application of 4CPG alone resulted in a facilitation of the visual response and this effect was not changed when the visual stimulus contrast was varied. Response habituation was observed when visual stimuli were presented at 0.5 s intervals, but this was not affected by DHPG or 4CPG. In slices of the superior colliculus, stimulation of the optic tract resulted in a field EPSP recorded from the SSC whose duration was increased in the presence of the GABA antagonists picrotoxin and CGP55845. Application of DHPG (5‐100 μM) reduced the field EPSP, and this effect could be reversed by the mGluR1 antagonist LY367385 (200 μM), but not by the mGluR5 antagonist MPEP (5 μM). These data show that activation of mGluR1, but probably not mGluR5, can modulate visual responses of SSC neurones in vivo, and that this could be via presynaptic inhibition of glutamate release from either retinal or, possibly, cortical afferents.