Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES)is a small vessel microangiopathy of the cerebral vasculature that occurs in 0.5-5% of solid organ transplant recipients, most commonly associated with tacrolimus (Tac). Clinical manifestations include hypertension and neurologic symptoms. We report an adult multivisceral transplant recipient who experienced recurrent PRES initially associated with Tac and subsequently with sirolimus. A 49-year-old woman with short bowel syndrome underwent multivisceral transplantation due to total parenteral nutrition-related liver disease. She was initially maintained on Tac, mycophenalate mofetil (MMF) and prednisone. Three months after transplantation, she developed renal dysfunction, leading to a reduction in Tac and the addition of sirolimus. Eight months after transplantation, she developed PRES. Tac was discontinued and PRES resolved. Sirolimus was increased to maintain trough levels of 12-15 ng/mL. Fourteen months after transplant, she experienced recurrent PRES which resolved after discontinuing sirolimus. Currently 3 years posttransplant, she is maintained on cyclosporine, MMF and prednisone with no PRES recurrence. In addition to calcineurin inhibitors, sirolimus may also be associated with PRES after solid organ transplantation. Ours is the first report of sirolimus-associated PRES in the setting of multivisceral transplantation. Identifying a safe alternative immunosuppression regimen was challenging but ultimately successful.

Available data support the use of gabapentin as a well-tolerated and effective treatment option for patients with UP who are unresponsive to traditional therapies. Further well-designed trials are warranted to establish the most appropriate dosing regimen in patients on HD.

Objectives: The optimal dose of rabbit antithymocyte globulin induction therapy in kidney transplant recipients with high immunologic risk lacks consensus. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of using ideal body weight rather than total body weight for the weight-based dose calculations in this patient population. Materials and Methods: Data were retrospectively collected on 89 adult patients who received rabbit antithymocyte globulin induction therapy for high immunologic risk kidney transplant. Hospital protocol changed from the use of cumulative rabbit antithymocyte globulin doses of 7.5 mg/kg total body weight to 7.5 mg/kg ideal body weight in 2009. Patients were separated into 2 cohorts based on the amount of rabbit antithymocyte globulin (in mg/kg total body weight) received. Rate of biopsy-proven acute rejection, patient survival, and allograft function were evaluated at 90 days and 1 year after transplant. Cost of induction therapy was also evaluated. Results: Baseline demographics were predominantly similar between the 2 cohorts. No significant difference in maintenance immunosuppression was identified. Rates of biopsy-proven acute rejection at 90 days and 1 year were similar between ideal and total body weight cohorts (4.2% vs 0% at 90 days, P = .5; 8.7% vs 0% at 1 year, P = .13). Patient survival and allograft function were also similar. Median cost of rabbit antithymocyte globulin induction therapy per patient was lower in the ideal body weight cohort, but this difference was not statistically significant ($17 542 vs $19 934; P = .3). Conclusions: Our results suggest that use of ideal body weight for dose calculations of rabbit antithymocyte globulin induction therapy in high immunologic risk kidney transplant recipients at 7.5 mg/kg results in low rates of acute rejection with a safety profile similar to that shown with a total body weight dosage. Use of ideal body weight for lower cumulative doses may still need further evaluation in this patient population.

It is recommended to start cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis within 10 days of solid organ transplant, if indicated. Our center underwent a cost‐savings initiative to delay CMV prophylaxis initiation from postoperative day zero to postoperative day 7 or upon discharge, hypothesizing this would not affect clinical outcomes but could impact costs. The purpose of this retrospective study was to determine the effects of early vs delayed (<72 vs >72 hours after transplant) CMV prophylaxis in kidney and kidney/pancreas transplant recipients transplanted between June 2014 and January 2017. The primary endpoint was incidence of CMV infection within 1 year. Secondary endpoints included CMV disease, CMV testing, and valganciclovir cost during index hospitalization. A total of 173 patients (114 early, 59 delayed) were included. CMV infection occurred in 61% vs 54% in the early vs delayed group (P = .5). Excluding low‐level DNAemia (QNAT < 200 IU/mL), infection occurred in 30% vs 22% in the early vs late group (P = .4). The median days to starting prophylaxis were 0 and 6 in the early and delayed group (P < .05), which led to a median cost savings of $497.00 per patient during index hospitalization (P < .05). Delaying prophylaxis initiation did not impact CMV outcomes in this cohort and decreased costs.

Objectives: Delaying cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis after liver transplantation may limit medication side effects and reduce inpatient drug costs. The primary objective of this study was to determine the incidence of CMV DNAemia in liver transplant recipients who initiated prophylaxis immediately after transplant (early prophylaxis) and those who initiated prophylaxis on postoperative day 7 or at discharge, whichever came first (delayed prophylaxis).Study Design: This was a retrospective, single-center study of adult liver transplant recipients between February 2017 and February 2019. Patients who were at low risk for CMV (D−/R−), received dual organs, had a history of invasive CMV disease, or received prophylaxis with an agent other than ganciclovir/valganciclovir were excluded.Chart review of patient profiles was completed 9 months following the transplant, and the primary end point was the first positive CMV PCR within that timeframe.Cumulative incidence of CMV DNAemia was estimated by adjusting for competing events for early and delayed prophylaxis groups. The subdistribution hazard model was utilized to examine the effect of the timing of prophylaxis on CMV DNAemia while accounting for CMV serostatus. Secondary end points included peak quantifiable viral load, time to detection, and incidence of tissue-invasive disease.Results: A total of 119 patients (60 early prophylaxis and 59 delayed prophylaxis) were included, and baseline demographics were similar except for sex. Twenty patients in the early group and 17 in the delayed group developed CMV DNAemia within 9 months of transplant with a cumulative incidence of 31.7% (95% confidence interval (CI) 20%, 44%) and 28.8% (95% CI 18%, 41%), respectively. After controlling for CMV serostatus, the relative incidence of DNAemia was similar between prophylaxis groups (subdistribution hazard ratio: 1.01, 95% CI 0.53, 1.90). Conclusions:No significant difference in CMV DNAemia within 9 months of liver transplant was observed between patients who received early and delayed prophylaxis. Future studies are warranted to conclude that delaying prophylaxis can be considered a safe alternative to initiating prophylaxis immediately after transplant.