An increased susceptibility to disease is one hypothesis explaining how inbreeding hastens extinction in island endemics and threatened species. Experimental studies show that disease resistance declines as inbreeding increases, but data from in situ wildlife systems are scarce. Genetic diversity increases with island size across the entire range of an extremely inbred Galápagos endemic bird, providing the context for a natural experiment examining the effects of inbreeding on disease susceptibility. Extremely inbred populations of Galápagos hawks had higher parasite abundances than relatively outbred populations. We found a significant island effect on constitutively produced natural antibody (NAb) levels and inbred populations generally harboured lower average and less variable NAb levels than relatively outbred populations. Furthermore, NAb levels explained abundance of amblyceran lice, which encounter the host immune system. This is the first study linking inbreeding, innate immunity and parasite load in an endemic, in situ wildlife population and provides a clear framework for assessment of disease risk in a Galápagos endemic.
Population bottlenecks may reduce genetic variation and potentially increase the risk of extinction. Here, we present the first study to use historic samples to analyse loss of variation at the major histocompatibility complex (MHC), which plays a central role in vertebrate disease resistance. Balancing selection acts on the MHC and could moderate the loss of variation expected from drift; however, in a Wisconsin population of greater prairie‐chickens (Tympanuchus cupido), the number of MHC class II B alleles per individual declined by 44% following a population bottleneck, compared to a loss of only 8% at microsatellites. Simulations indicate that drift likely reduced MHC variation at the population level, as well as within individuals by reducing the number of gene copies per individual or by fixing the same alleles across multiple loci. These multiple effects of genetic drift on MHC variation could have important implications for immunity and fitness.
Hamilton and Zuk proposed that females choose mates based on ornaments whose expression is dependent on their genetically based resistance to parasites. The major histocompatibility complex (MHC) plays an important role in pathogen recognition and is a good candidate for testing the relationships between immune genes and both ornament expression and parasite resistance. We tested the hypothesis that female common yellowthroats prefer to mate with more ornamented males, because it is a signal of
The major histocompatibility complex (MHC) is characterized by a birth and death model of evolution involving gene duplication, diversification, loss of function, and deletion. As a result, gene number varies across taxa. Birds have between one and 7 confirmed MHC class II B genes, and the greatest diversity appears to occur in passerines. We used multiple primer sets on both genomic DNA (gDNA) and complementary DNA (cDNA) to characterize the range of class II B genes present in a passerine, the common yellowthroat (Geothlypis trichas). We confirmed 39 exon 2 sequences from gDNA in a single individual, indicating the presence of at least 20 class II B loci. From a second individual, we recovered 16 cDNA sequences belonging to at least 8 transcribed loci. Phylogenetic analysis showed that common yellowthroat sequences fell into subgroups consisting of classical loci, as well as at least 4 different clusters of sequences with reduced sequence variability that may represent pseudogenes or nonclassical loci. Data from 2 additional common yellowthroats demonstrated high interindividual variability. Our results reveal that some passerines possess an extraordinary diversity of MHC gene duplications, including both classical and nonclassical loci.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.