These guidelines are a consensus work of a considerable number of members of the immunology and flow cytometry community. They provide the theory and key practical aspects of flow cytometry enabling immunologists to avoid the common errors that often undermine immunological data. Notably, there are comprehensive sections of all major immune cell types with helpful Tables detailing phenotypes in murine and human cells. The latest flow cytometry techniques and applications are also described, featuring examples of the data that can be generated and, importantly, how the data can be analysed. Furthermore, there are sections detailing tips, tricks and pitfalls to avoid, all written and peer‐reviewed by leading experts in the field, making this an essential research companion.

The systemic processes involved in the manifestation of life-threatening COVID-19 and in disease recovery are still incompletely understood, despite investigations focusing on the dysregulation of immune responses after SARS-CoV-2 infection. To define hallmarks of severe COVID-19 in acute disease (n = 58) and in disease recovery in convalescent patients (n = 28) from Hannover Medical School, we used flow cytometry and proteomics data with unsupervised clustering analyses. In our observational study, we combined analyses of immune cells and cytokine/chemokine networks with endothelial activation and injury. ICU patients displayed an altered immune signature with prolonged lymphopenia but the expansion of granulocytes and plasmablasts along with activated and terminally differentiated T and NK cells and high levels of SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies. The core signature of seven plasma proteins revealed a highly inflammatory microenvironment in addition to endothelial injury in severe COVID-19. Changes within this signature were associated with either disease progression or recovery. In summary, our data suggest that besides a strong inflammatory response, severe COVID-19 is driven by endothelial activation and barrier disruption, whereby recovery depends on the regeneration of the endothelial integrity.

The role of endothelial cells in the pathophysiology of antibody-mediated rejection after renal transplantation has been widely investigated. We expand this scenario to the impact of epithelial cells on the microenvironment during rejection. Primary proximal tubular epithelial cells were stimulated via HLA class I, CD155 and CD166based on their potential signal-transducing capacity to mediate back signaling after encounter with either T/NK cells or donor-specific antibodies. Upon crosslinking of these ligands with mAbs, PTEC secreted IL-6, CXCL1,8,10, CCL2, and sICAM-1.These proteins were also released by PTEC as consequence of a direct interaction with T/NK cells. Downmodulation of the receptor CD226 on effector cells confirmed the involvement of this receptor/ligand pair in back signaling. In vivo, CD155 and CD166 expression was detectable in proximal and distal tubuli of renal transplant biopsies, respectively. The composition of the protein microenvironment in these biopsies showed a substantial overlap with the PTEC response. Cluster and principal component analyses of the microenvironment separated unsuspicious from rejection biopsies and, furthermore, ABMR, TCMR, and borderline rejection. In conclusion, our results provide evidence that epithelial cells may contribute to the rejection process and pave the way to a better understanding of the pathomechanisms of kidney allograft rejection. K E Y W O R D Sbasic (laboratory) research/science, biomarker, immune regulation, immunobiology, immunosuppression/immune modulation, kidney transplantation/nephrology, natural killer (NK) cells/NK receptors, rejection: antibody-mediated (ABMR), T cell biology | 2693 EGELKAMP Et AL.

No abstract

No abstract