No abstract

Pseudarthrosis development is dependent on the presence of individual risk factors in approximately 10% as a result of fractures and are more frequently located in the region of the long bones. The development of non-union regularly results in prolonged pain and reduced functionality of the affected limb. The resulting clearly increased socioeconomic costs are caused by the complex operative treatment strategies and increased indirect costs, which include lost wages, social benefits and compensation. Altogether, non-unions require a differentiated therapeutic treatment strategy. The analysis of the non-union based on the diamond concept is the key for a successful planning and therapy. In this context, the use of focused, high-energy extracorporeal shock waves may be possible under specific circumstances; however, in most cases an operative revision is necessary to optimize the biomechanical stability and/or improve the local biology.

Background The optimal treatment strategy for the surgical management of femur fractures and non-unions remains unknown. The aim of this study is to assess union rates, complications and outcome after femoral double plating. Treatment of shaft, distal, periprosthetic fractures and pathological proximal femur fractures as well as femoral non-unions with double plating were evaluated. Methods A systematic review according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement was conducted. Published literature reporting on the treatment and clinical outcome of femoral fractures and non-unions with double plating was identified. In total, 24 studies with 436 cases of double plating, 64 cases of single plating, 84 cases of intramedullary nailing (IM), and 1 interfragmentary screw treatment met the inclusion criteria of this systematic review. The evaluated literature was published between 1991 and 2020. Results Double plating of femoral fractures achieved high healing rates and few complications were reported. It displayed significantly less intraoperative haemorrhage, shorter surgery time reduced risk of malunion in polytraumatised patients when compared to IM. Fracture healing rate of double-plating distal femoral fractures was 88.0%. However, there were no significant differences regarding fracture healing, complication or functional outcome when compared to single plating. Treatment of periprosthetic fractures with double plating displayed high healing rates (88.5%). Double plating of non-unions achieved excellent osseous union rates (98.5%). Conclusions The literature provides evidence for superior outcomes when using double plating in distal femoral fractures, periprosthetic fractures and femoral non-unions. Some evidence suggests that the use of double plating of femoral fractures in polytraumatised patients may be beneficial over other types of fracture fixation. Level of evidence IV.

We established the ESWT as an important treatment option for fracture nonunion in our clinic. Considering the selection of patients in this study with a high mean time from injury to ESWT and multiple prior operations, the fracture healing rate of 73 % after ESWT is comparable with operative healing rates of nonunions. Further prospective, randomized and controlled studies are needed to show the effectiveness of ESWT in the treatment of nonunions on a higher level of evidence and to identify pseudarthrosis that particularly responds to the EWST.

No abstract