T he overall aim of the NHS R&D Health Technology Assessment (HTA) programme is to ensure that high-quality research information on the costs, effectiveness and broader impact of health technologies is produced in the most efficient way for those who use, manage and work in the NHS. Research is undertaken in those areas where the evidence will lead to the greatest benefits to patients, either through improved patient outcomes or the most efficient use of NHS resources. The Standing Group on Health Technology advises on national priorities for health technology assessment. Six advisory panels assist the Standing Group in identifying and prioritising projects. These priorities are then considered by the HTA Commissioning Board supported by the National Coordinating Centre for HTA (NCCHTA). This report is one of a series covering acute care, diagnostics and imaging, methodology, pharmaceuticals, population screening, and primary and community care. It was identified as a priority by the Population Screening Panel and funded as project number 95/14/01. The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Standing Group, the Commissioning Board, the Panel members or the Department of Health. The editors wish to emphasise that funding and publication of this research by the NHS should not be taken as implicit support for the recommendations for policy contained herein. In particular, policy options in the area of screening will be considered by the National Screening Committee. This Committee, chaired by the Chief Medical Officer, will take into account the views expressed here, further available evidence and other relevant considerations. Reviews in Health Technology Assessment are termed 'systematic' when the account of the search, appraisal and synthesis methods (to minimise biases and random errors) would, in theory, permit the replication of the review by others.
1.of technical uranium and certain alloys of interest f o r use in naturaluranium fuelled reactors are described, .technical purity uranium a r e first discussed and the time-temperaturetransformation data resented.Results on binary alloys comprising U/&, U/Cr, Uhe, Uho, UA, U/Ti, U/V and U/Zr, contahing up t o about 2 atomic per cent of the a l l o y i n g element, a r e described. C r , Fe and Z r were found t o be the most d f e c t i v e grain refining agents.Al and V were satisfactory under some conditions whereas Mo, N% and T i were ineffective. 3.curves indicated that grain refinement i s associated w i t h depression of the temperature of transformation on heat treatment, the extent of' this depression for a given cooling-rate being dependent on the alloy content.i t was found that alloys such a s U/zr and u b e responded t o water quenching thermal treatment a t 500 to 6OO0C.Metallographic and dilatometric studies of the heat treatment behaviourThe micro-structure and secondary phases present i n high purity and
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.