Background: Currently, there is a great interest in the potential medical use of cannabidiol (CBD), a non-intoxicating cannabinoid. Productive pharmacological research on CBD occurred in the 1970s and intensified recently with many discoveries about the endocannabinoid system. Multiple preclinical and clinical studies led to FDA-approval of Epidiolex®, a purified CBD medicine formulated for oral administration for the treatment of infantile refractory epileptic syndromes, by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2018. The World Health Organization considers rescheduling cannabis and cannabinoids. CBD use around the world is expanding for diseases that lack scientific evidence of the drug’s efficacy. Preclinical and clinical studies also report adverse effects (AEs) and toxicity following CBD intake. Methods: Relevant studies reporting CBD’s AEs or toxicity were identified from PubMed, Cochrane Central, and EMBASE through January 2019. Studies defining CBD’s beneficial effects were included to provide balance in estimating risk/benefit. Results: CBD is not risk-free. In animals, CBD AEs included developmental toxicity, embryo-fetal mortality, central nervous system inhibition and neurotoxicity, hepatocellular injuries, spermatogenesis reduction, organ weight alterations, male reproductive system alterations, and hypotension, although at doses higher than recommended for human pharmacotherapies. Human CBD studies for epilepsy and psychiatric disorders reported CBD-induced drug-drug interactions, hepatic abnormalities, diarrhea, fatigue, vomiting, and somnolence. Conclusion: CBD has proven therapeutic efficacy for serious conditions such as Dravet and Lennox-Gastaut syndromes and is likely to be recommended off label by physicians for other conditions. However, AEs and potential drug-drug interactions must be taken into consideration by clinicians prior to recommending off-label CBD.

Recently, synthetic opioid-related overdose fatalities, led by illicitly manufactured fentanyl and analogs, increased at an alarming rate, posing a global public health threat. New synthetic fentanyl analogs have been constantly emerging onto the drug marked for the last few years, to circumvent the laws and avoid analytical detection. Analytical methods need to be regularly updated to keep up with the new trends. In this study, we aimed to develop a new method for detecting the newest fentanyl analogs with a high sensitivity, in whole blood, urine, and hair. The method is intended to provide to clinical and forensic toxicologists a tool for documenting consumption. We developed a comprehensive ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for quantifying fentanyl and 22 analogs and metabolites. Urine samples were simply diluted before injection; a liquid-liquid extraction was performed for blood testing; and a solid phase extraction was performed in hair. The chromatographic separation was short (8 min). The method was validated with a high sensitivity; limits of quantifications ranged from 2 to 6 ng/L in blood and urine, and from 11 to 21 pg/g in hair. The suitability of the method was tested with 42 postmortem blood, urine, or hair specimens from 27 fatalities in which fentanyl analogs were involved. Average blood concentrations (±SD) were 7.84 ± 7.21 and 30.0 ± 18.0 μg/L for cyclopropylfentanyl and cyclopropyl norfentanyl, respectively ( n = 8), 4.08 ± 2.30 μg/L for methoxyacetylfentanyl, ( n = 4), 40.2 ± 38.6 and 44.5 ± 21.1 μg/L for acetylfentanyl and acetyl norfentanyl, respectively ( n = 3), 33.7 and 7.17 μg/L for fentanyl and norfentanyl, respectively ( n = 1), 3.60 and 0.90 μg/L for furanylfentanyl and furanyl norfentanyl, respectively ( n = 1), 0.67 μg/L for sufentanil ( n = 1), and 3.13 ± 2.37 μg/L for 4-ANPP ( n = 9). Average urine concentrations were 47.7 ± 39.3 and 417 ± 296 μg/L for cyclopropylfentanyl and cyclopropyl norfentanyl, respectively ( n = 11), 995 ± 908 μg/L for methoxyacetylfentanyl, ( n = 3), 1,874 ± 1,710 and 6,582 ± 3,252 μg/L for acetylfentanyl and acetyl norfentanyl, respectively ( n = 5), 146 ± 318 and 300 ± 710 μg/L for fentanyl ( n = 5) and norfentanyl ( n = 6), respectively, 84.0 and 23.0 μg/L for furanylfentanyl and furanyl norfentanyl, respectively ( n = 1), and 50.5 ± 50.9 μg/L for 4-ANPP ( n = 10). Average hair concentrations were 2,670 ± 184 and 82.1 ± 94.7 ng/g for fentanyl and norfentanyl, respectively ( n = 2), and 10.8 ± 0.57 ng/g for 4-ANPP ( n = 2).

Background: Little or no pharmacological or toxicological data are available for novel psychoactive substances when they first emerge, making their identification and interpretation in biological matrices challenging. Materials & methods: A new synthetic cathinone, α-pyrrolidinopentiothiophenone (α-PVT), was incubated with hepatocytes and samples were analyzed using liquid chromatography coupled to a Q Exactive TM Orbitrap mass spectrometer. Authentic urine specimens from suspected α-PVT cases were also analyzed. Scans were data mined with Compound Discoverer™ for identification and structural elucidation of metabolites. Results/conclusion: Seven α-PVT metabolites were identified in hepatocyte incubations, and in the authentic urine samples, also with an additional monohydroxylated product and a glucuronide of low intensity. α-PVT dihydroxypyrrolidinyl, α-PVT 2-ketopyrrolidinyl, α-PVT hydroxythiophenyl and α-PVT thiophenol had the most intense in vivo signals.

No abstract