This experiment was a 2X2X2X2 factorial design field simulation that examined the effects of four independent variables on perceived invasion of privacy. The objectives of this research were to determine whether employees were more likely to perceive an invasion of privacy when (a) personal information was given freely without (vs. with) their permission, (b) the disclosure of personal information produced unfavorable (vs. favorable) consequences, (c) personality (vs. performance) information was disclosed, and (d) personal information was disclosed to external (vs. internal) recipients. Employees (A' = 2,047) of five major corporations were randomly selected from the available pool of employees on location and were randomly distributed in the research design. Subjects read one of 16 hypothetical situations describing an employee who had applied for a new job that was a promotion and responded to a series of questions designed to assess their perceptions of the situation. The results of the study support its hypotheses. Specifically, the subjects perceived a greater invasion of privacy with personality information than with performance information, with no permission for disclosure than with permission, with unfavorable consequences of disclosure than with favorable consequences, and with external disclosure than with internal disclosure. Eta-squared values revealed that permission was the most important main effect, location of disclosure second, consequences third, and type of information least important. The results are discussed, and suggestions for future research are offered.In July 1977, the Privacy Protection Study hearings on employee privacy in the work-Commission issued the results of its exten-place. The Department of Labor hearings sive investigation of the individual right to included the testimony of both scholars and privacy and of record-keeping practices in managers and underscored the current demany environments. In addition, the U.S. bate as to whether there should be federal Department of Labor recently completed legislation regulating the collection and dissemination of employee personnel informa----:--,,,... .--tion by employers (McChriston, Note 1; Portions of this article were presented at the National c ». . ", : M ... Academy of Management Convention, Detroit, Michi-&tone -Note £ Westin, Not& 5). gan, August 1980. At present, legislation regulating to vary-This research was funded by a grant from the Infor-ing degrees all record-keeping systems conmation Privacy Research Center, Purdue University, to taining personal data Stored by either public ^^t^^^^^o.^ or private sector organizations has been chinsky, Department of Management, College of Busi-passed by 15 states {Government Disclosure ness
Women and minorities are underrepresented in the leadership of the American Society of Anesthesiologists. Efforts should be made to increase the diversity of the American Society of Anesthesiologists leadership with the goal of reducing overall anesthesia workforce disparities.
While U.S. opioid prescribing has decreased 38% in the past decade, opioid deaths have increased 300%. This opioid paradox is poorly recognized. Current approaches to opioid management are not working, and new approaches are needed. This article reviews the outcomes and shortcomings of recent U.S. opioid policies and strategies that focus primarily or exclusively on reducing or eliminating opioid prescribing. It introduces concepts of a prescription opioid ecosystem and opioid pool, and it discusses how the pool can be influenced by supply-side, demand-side, and opioid returns factors. It illuminates pressing policy needs for an opioid ecosystem that enables proper opioid stewardship, identifies associated responsibilities, and emphasizes the necessity of making opioid returns as easy and common as opioid prescribing, in order to minimize the size of the opioid pool available for potential diversion, misuse, overdose, and death. Approaches are applicable to opioid prescribing in general, and to opioid prescribing after surgery.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.