BACKGROUNDExperimental and clinical evidence suggests that cyclosporine may attenuate reperfusion injury and reduce myocardial infarct size. We aimed to test whether cyclosporine would improve clinical outcomes and prevent adverse left ventricular remodeling. METHODSIn a multicenter, double-blind, randomized trial, we assigned 970 patients with an acute anterior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) who were undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) within 12 hours after symptom onset and who had complete occlusion of the culprit coronary artery to receive a bolus injection of cyclosporine (administered intravenously at a dose of 2.5 mg per kilogram of body weight) or matching placebo before coronary recanalization. The primary outcome was a composite of death from any cause, worsening of heart failure during the initial hospitalization, rehospitalization for heart failure, or adverse left ventricular remodeling at 1 year. Adverse left ventricular remodeling was defined as an increase of 15% or more in the left ventricular end-diastolic volume. RESULTSA total of 395 patients in the cyclosporine group and 396 in the placebo group received the assigned study drug and had data that could be evaluated for the primary outcome at 1 year. The rate of the primary outcome was 59.0% in the cyclosporine group and 58.1% in the control group (odds ratio, 1.04; 95% confidence interval, 0.78 to 1.39; P = 0.77). Cyclosporine did not reduce the incidence of the separate clinical components of the primary outcome or other events, including recurrent infarction, unstable angina, and stroke. No significant difference in the safety profile was observed between the two treatment groups. CONCLUSIONSIn patients with anterior STEMI who had been referred for primary PCI, intravenous cyclosporine did not result in better clinical outcomes than those with placebo and did not prevent adverse left ventricular remodeling at 1 year. ( n engl j med 373;11 nejm.org September 10, 2015 1022T h e ne w e ngl a nd jou r na l o f m e dicine O ver the past three decades, major progress has been made in the treatment of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).1 Nevertheless, the rates of death, heart failure, and recurrent ischemic events occurring in the first year after infarction remain unacceptably elevated in this highrisk population. Although many advances have been made in the development of methods to reopen the culprit coronary artery and prevent reocclusion, there is currently no specific treatment that targets myocardial reperfusion injury, which is a paradoxical form of myocardial damage that occurs as a result of the restoration of vessel patency.2 Growing evidence from experimental studies and small-size proof-of-concept clinical trials shows that reperfusion injury contributes greatly to the final infarct size.3-5 Preclinical studies indicate that the opening of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore (PTP) in the inner mitochondrial membrane plays a major role in reperfusion injury. ...

Hydroquinidine therapy prevented VT/VF inducibility in 76% of asymptomatic patients with BrS and inducible arrhythmia, as well as VT/VF recurrence in all BrS patients with multiple ICD shocks. These preliminary data suggest that preventive treatment by HQ may be an alternative strategy to ICD placement in asymptomatic patients with BrS and inducible arrhythmia.

We assessed the predictive value of new radiomic features characterizing lesion dissemination in baseline 18 F-FDG PET and tested whether combining them with baseline metabolic tumor volume (MTV) could improve prediction of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients. Methods: From the LNH073B trial (NCT00498043), patients with advancedstage DLCBL and 18 F-FDG PET/CT images available for review were selected. MTV and several radiomic features, including the distance between the 2 lesions that were farthest apart (Dmax patient), were calculated. Receiver-operating-characteristic analysis was used to determine the optimal cutoff for quantitative variables, and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were performed. Results: With a median age of 46 y, 95 patients were enrolled, half of them treated with R-CHOP biweekly (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) and the other half with R-ACVBP (rituximab, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vindesine, bleomycin, and prednisone), with no significant impact on outcome. Median MTV and Dmax patient were 375 cm 3 and 45 cm, respectively. The median follow-up was 44 mo. High MTV and Dmax patient were adverse factors for PFS (P 5 0.027 and P 5 0.0003, respectively) and for OS (P 5 0.0007 and P 5 0.0095, respectively). In multivariate analysis, only Dmax patient was significantly associated with PFS (P 5 0.0014) whereas both factors remained significant for OS (P 5 0.037 and P 5 0.0029, respectively). Combining MTV (.384 cm 3) and Dmax patient (.58 cm) yielded 3 risk groups for PFS (P 5 0.0003) and OS (P 5 0.0011): high with 2 adverse factors (4-y PFS and OS of 50% and 53%, respectively, n 5 18), low with no adverse factor (94% and 97%, n 5 36), and an intermediate category with 1 adverse factor (73% and 88%, n 5 41). Conclusion: Combining MTV with a parameter reflecting the tumor burden dissemination further improves DLBCL patient risk stratification at staging.