Our findings suggest that spectacle wearing compliance studies will not be comparable unless a standard time frame is used to assess compliance. We found assessing self-reported compliance to be a useful tool in guiding our program. Understanding the reasons for non-compliance will help guide corrective action and planning of interventions designed to increase wearing rates.
Millions of people need eyeglasses and do not have them. Assuming that the average pair of eyeglasses has an effective life span of two to five years, an additional 60 to 150 million spectacles would be needed each year for the estimated 303 million individuals who currently need correction.
Optometrists are engaged in a variety of capacities in an attempt to address the significant public health problem of uncorrected refractive error. One popular method used by many voluntary optometry‐led organisations is to provide direct clinical services to individual patients in developing countries. Considerable manpower, materials, money and logistical resources are used in conducting these short‐term missions, yet scarce evidence exists regarding their cost effectiveness or the efficacy and long‐term impact of these interventions. The provision of direct clinical services by most foreign volunteers does not directly build local capacity and may hinder development of sustainable local services. Adopting public health approaches will enable volunteer provider organisations to dramatically increase their program effectiveness and output, while developing local capacities in a sustainable way. These approaches should include:
Following the national strategy for blindness prevention as determined by the Ministry of Health and forming partnerships with relevant local, national and international organisations.
Using need‐based criteria to target programs more efficiently.
Developing sustainable services via local capacity building.
Monitoring, evaluating and using evidence to guide programs.
By using these approaches, a larger contribution will be made by the volunteer organisations in addressing the unmet need for refractive correction.
Training refugee health workers has allowed for sustainable, low-cost spectacle provision to a large population over an extensive geographic area in a challenging environment.
Aim
To determine the prevalence and causes of blindness, vision impairment and cataract surgery coverage among Rohingya refugees aged ≥ 50 years residing in camps in Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh.
Methods
We used the Rapid Assessment of Avoidable Blindness (RAAB) methodology to select 76 clusters of 50 participants aged ≥ 50 years with probability proportionate to size. Demographic and cataract surgery data were collected using questionnaires, visual acuity was assessed per World Health Organization criteria and examinations were conducted by torch, and with direct ophthalmoscopy in eyes with pinhole-corrected vision <6/12. RAAB software was used for data entry and analysis.
Results
We examined 3,629 of 3800 selected persons (95.5%). Age and sex adjusted prevalence of blindness (<3/60), severe visual impairment (SVI; >3/60 to ≤6/60), moderate visual impairment (MVI; >6/60 to ≤6/18), and early visual impairment (EVI; >6/18 to ≤6/12) were 2.14%, 2.35%, 9.68% and 14.7% respectively. Cataract was responsible for 75.0% of blindness and 75.8% of SVI, while refractive error caused 47.9% and 90.9% of MVI and EVI respectively. Most vision loss (95.9%) was avoidable. Cataract surgical coverage among the blind was 81.2%. Refractive error was detected in 17.1% (n = 622) of participants and 95.2% (n = 592) of these did not have spectacles. In the full Rohingya cohort of 76,692, approximately 10,000 surgeries are needed to correct all eyes impaired (<6/18) by cataract, 12,000 need distance glasses and 73,000 require presbyopic correction.
Conclusion
The prevalence of blindness was lower than expected for a displaced population, in part due to few Rohingya being ≥60 years and the camp’s good access to cataract surgery. We suggest the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees include eye care among recommended health services for all refugees with long-term displacement.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.