Background. Biomedical waste (BMW) is defined as unwanted materials generated during diagnosis, treatment, operation, immunization, or in research activities including production of biologicals. Healthcare workers are responsible for the proper management of this waste for human safety and for the protection of the environment. Methods. An analytical knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) study was carried out at Biyem-Assi District Hospital from June 1st to July 5th, 2018, including 100 health workers from different departments. Variables of interest were knowledge, attitudes, and practices of the respondents. A structured and pretested questionnaire was used for data collection. Data analysis was carried out using software Epi Info version 7.2.2.6. Logistic regression was used to establish the relationship between knowledge, attitudes, and practices. Results. Nurses constituted 32.0% of the participants, and more than half of the participants had 1–4 years of working experience (56.0%). Overall, the level of knowledge was satisfactory at 50.0%, that of attitudes was as unfavorable at 83.0%, and that of practices was as poor at 50.0%. Favorable attitudes were associated to satisfactory level of knowledge (ORa = 5.14 [3.10–8.51] and p=0.005). Good practices were associated to good level of knowledge (ORa = 5.26 [3.17–8.7] and p<0.001) and a favorable attitude (ORa = 7.30 [2.25–23, 71] and p<0.001). Conclusion. The level of knowledge was considered unsatisfactory for half of the staff interviewed. Attitudes were unfavourable at 83.0% and poor practices at 50.0%. Staff with a good level of knowledge were more likely to have favourable attitudes towards BWM. Also, good knowledge and attitude positively influenced the practice with regard to BMW management.
Objective. To analyze the epidemiological aspects of invasive cervical cancer according to HIV status. Methods. This was an historical cohort study from January 2010 to April 2017 in three hospitals at the Yaoundé city Capital, Cameroon, after the National Ethics Committee’ approval. We included invasive cervical cancers with documented HIV status. Odds ratios and 95% confidence interval were calculated to assess the association between the different variables and HIV status. Survival was analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier. The level of significance was set up at <5%. Results. Among the overall 213 cervical cancer patients, 56 were HIV+ (24.67%). Factors associated with positive HIV status were age below 40 (OR: 2.03 (1.38–2.67)), celibacy (OR: 2.88 (1.58–4.17)), nonmenopausal status (OR: 2.56 (1.36–3.75)), low parity, primiparity (OR: 2.59 (1.43–3.74)), and for parity with 2–4 children (OR: 2.24 (1.35–3.12)). Concerning the HIV+ patients, tumor was diagnosed late (stages III-IV) (OR: 2.70 (1.43–5.08)), undifferentiated (grade III) (OR: 7.69 (5.80–9.57)), with low median survival (9.83 months vs. 20.10 months). Conclusion. HIV is frequent among cervical cancer patients. In the HIV+ patients, the diagnosis was made at the advanced stage, cells were poorly differentiated, and the prognosis was worse.
Introduction : Le cancer du col de l’utérus est responsable d’environ 311 000 décès par an dans le monde et 1 540 décès au Cameroun. Il s’agit d’un problème majeur de Santé Publique, mais seulement une femme sur dix bénéficie du dépistage du cancer du col de l’utérus au Cameroun. Peu de données sont disponibles sur les connaissances, attitudes et pratiques des professionnels de santé à l’Ouest du Cameroun. L’objectif de cette étude était d’évaluer les connaissances, attitudes et pratiques de ces professionnels vis-à-vis du cancer du col de l’utérus. Résultats : Au total 200 prestataires de soins ont été recrutés. S’agissant des connaissances sur la cause principale du cancer du col, 35 % des répondants étaient capables de citer l’infection au HPV. Quant aux moyens de prévention, 32 % des professionnels de santé connaissaient le vaccin anti-HPV. Au regard de la perception de la maladie, 79,3 % des médecins estimaient que le cancer du col est une affection grave. Au cours de leur pratique, 15 % des répondants déclaraient recommander systématiquement le dépistage du cancer du col de l’utérus aux femmes de plus de 25 ans. Conclusion : Les professionnels du district de santé de la Mifi ont de faibles niveaux de connaissances et de pratique sur la prévention du cancer du col utérin. La formation des professionnels de santé et le développement des centres du dépistage du cancer du col sont nécessaires à la Mifi.
Introduction cervical cancer is an illness that causes 250,000 deaths worldwide. Data on Health professional's skills is highly important for the elaboration of prevention strategies. Objective: assess the knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) among Brazzaville midwives on cervical cancer screening. Methods analytical KAP Study, from May 2 nd to August 10 th 2018. Participants are midwives working in the Gynaecology-Obstetrics departments of six hospitals in Brazzaville (Republic of Congo). Variables were related to their socio-demographic and occupational characteristics, as well as to their knowledge, attitudes and practices. Analyses were done using the Epi Info 7.2.2.6 software. Frequencies, central trend parameters, as well as rib ratios were calculated. Pearson, Fisher and Wald statistical tests with a significance level of 5% where used. Results the study included 114 midwives aged 43.07 (± 7.40) years. They had an unsatisfactory level of knowledge (59.64%), favourable attitudes (92.98%) and poor practices (71.05%). The factors linked with best (satisfactory) knowledge were, seniority at workplace (10-27 years) [29.31%] vs. 51, 79%; OR; 2.59 (1.19-5.60)] and age (42-60 years) [31.81% vs. 52.08%; OR 2.32 (1.08-5.01)]. The best knowledge were related to the best practices (good) [16.18% vs. 47.83%; OR a = 2.95 (1.87-4.67)]; Midwives attitudes seem to not impact on their practices (p = 0.53). Conclusion Brazzaville midwives have little knowledge and practices on cervical cancer screening. Therefore, the need of training them and equipping cervical cancer screening.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.