Key Points• Hyperactivation of the BMP-SMAD pathway blunts EPO-mediated hepcidin inhibition.• Lack of BMP-SMAD pathway inhibition by matriptase-2 abrogates the ERFEmediated hepcidin suppression in response to EPO.Hepcidin, the main regulator of iron homeostasis, is repressed when erythropoiesis is acutely stimulated by erythropoietin (EPO) to favor iron supply to maturing erythroblasts. Erythroferrone (ERFE) has been identified as the erythroid regulator that inhibits hepcidin in stress erythropoiesis. A powerful hepcidin inhibitor is the serine protease matriptase-2, encoded by TMPRSS6, whose mutations cause iron refractory iron deficiency anemia. Because this condition has inappropriately elevated hepcidin in the presence of high EPO levels, a role is suggested for matriptase-2 in EPO-mediated hepcidin repression. To investigate the relationship between EPO/ERFE and matriptase-2, we show that EPO injection induces Erfe messenger RNA expression but does not suppress hepcidin in Tmprss6 knockout (KO) mice. Similarly, wild-type (WT) animals, in which the bone morphogenetic protein-mothers against decapentaplegic homolog (Bmp-Smad) pathway is upregulated by iron treatment, fail to suppress hepcidin in response to EPO. To further investigate whether the high level of Bmp-Smad signaling of Tmprss6 KO mice counteracts hepcidin suppression by EPO, we generated double KO Bmp6-Tmprss6 KO mice. Despite having Bmp-Smad signaling and hepcidin levels that are similar to WT mice under basal conditions, double KO mice do not suppress hepcidin in response to EPO. However, pharmacologic downstream inhibition of the Bmp-Smad pathway by dorsomorphin, which targets the BMP receptors, improves the hepcidin responsiveness to EPO in Tmprss6 KO mice. We concluded that the function of matriptase-2 is dominant over that of ERFE and is essential in facilitating hepcidin suppression by attenuating the

Purpose: In search of novel strategies to improve the outcome of advanced prostate cancer, we considered that prostate cancer cells rearrange iron homeostasis, favoring iron uptake and proliferation. We exploited this adaptation by exposing prostate cancer preclinical models to high-dose iron to induce toxicity and disrupt adaptation to androgen starvation. Experimental Design: We analyzed markers of cell viability and mechanisms underlying iron toxicity in androgen receptor–positive VCaP and LNCaP, castration-resistant DU-145 and PC-3, and murine TRAMP-C2 cells treated with iron and/or the antiandrogen bicalutamide. We validated the results in vivo in VCaP and PC-3 xenografts and in TRAMP-C2 injected mice treated with iron and/or bicalutamide. Results: Iron was toxic for all prostate cancer cells. In particular, VCaP, LNCaP, and TRAMP-C2 were highly iron sensitive. Toxicity was mediated by oxidative stress, which primarily affected lipids, promoting ferroptosis. In highly sensitive cells, iron additionally caused protein damage. High-basal iron content and oxidative status defined high iron sensitivity. Bicalutamide–iron combination exacerbated oxidative damage and cell death, triggering protein oxidation also in poorly iron-sensitive DU-145 and PC-3 cells. In vivo, iron reduced tumor growth in TRAMP-C2 and VCaP mice. In PC-3 xenografts, bicalutamide–iron combination caused protein oxidation and successfully impaired tumor expansion while single compounds were ineffective. Macrophages influenced body iron distribution but did not limit the iron effect on tumor expansion. Conclusions: Our models allow us to dissect the direct iron effect on cancer cells. We demonstrate the proof of principle that iron toxicity inhibits prostate cancer cell proliferation, proposing a novel tool to strengthen antiandrogen treatment efficacy.

Measuring the adaptive immune response after SARS-CoV-2 infection may improve our understanding of COVID-19 exposure and potential future protection or immunity. We analyzed T-cell and antibody signatures in a large population study of over 2,200 individuals from the municipality of Vo’, Italy, including 70 PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 cases (24 asymptomatic, 37 symptomatic, 9 hospitalized). Blood samples taken 60 days after PCR diagnosis demonstrated 97% (68/70) of the latter subjects had a positive T-cell test result, higher than an antibody serology assay (77%; 54/70 of subjects) performed on the same samples. The depth and breadth of the T-cell response was associated with disease severity, with symptomatic and hospitalized COVID-19 cases having significantly higher response than asymptomatic cases. In contrast, antibody levels at this convalescent time point were less informative as they did not correlate with disease severity. 45 additional suspected infections were identified based on T-cell response from the 2,220 subjects without confirmatory PCR tests. Among these, notably, subjects who reported symptoms or had household exposure to a PCR-confirmed infection demonstrated a higher T-cell test positive rate. Taken together, these results establish that T cells are a sensitive, reliable and persistent measure of past SARS-CoV-2 infection.

No abstract