Predictive analytics monitoring, the use of patient data to provide continuous risk estimation of deterioration, is a promising new application of big data analytical techniques to the care of individual patients. We tested the hypothesis that continuous display of novel electronic risk visualization of respiratory and cardiovascular events would impact intensive care unit (ICU) patient outcomes. In an adult tertiary care surgical trauma ICU, we displayed risk estimation visualizations on a large monitor, but in the medical ICU in the same institution we did not. The risk estimates were based solely on analysis of continuous cardiorespiratory monitoring. We examined 4275 individual patient records within a 7 month time period preceding and following data display. We determined cases of septic shock, emergency intubation, hemorrhage, and death to compare rates per patient care pre-and post-implementation. Following implementation, the incidence of septic shock fell by half (p < 0.01 in a multivariate model that included age and APACHE) in the surgical trauma ICU, where the data were continuously on display, but by only 10% (p = NS) in the control Medical ICU. There were no significant changes in the other outcomes. Display of a predictive analytics monitor based on continuous cardiorespiratory monitoring was followed by a reduction in the rate of septic shock, even when controlling for age and APACHE score.

Using Twitter to understand public sentiment offers a novel perspective to explore the context of health communication surrounding certain controversial issues.

BackgroundTo date, research and promotion regarding advance care planning (ACP) has targeted those with serious illness or the elderly, thereby ignoring healthy young adults. The purpose of this study was to explore young adults’ knowledge, attitudes, and preferences regarding advance care planning (ACP) and medical decision-making. Further, we aimed to understand the potential role of public health to encourage population-based promotion of ACP.MethodsBetween February 2007 and April 2007, we conducted six focus groups comprising 56 young adults ages 18–30. Topics explored included (1) baseline knowledge regarding ACP, (2) preferences for ACP, (3) characteristics of preferred surrogates, and (4) barriers and facilitators to completing ACP specific to age and individuation. We used a qualitative thematic approach to analyze transcripts.ResultsAll participants desired more information regarding ACP. In addition, participants expressed (1) heterogeneous attitudes regarding triggers to perform ACP, (2) the opinion that ACP is a marker of individuation, (3) the belief that prior exposure to illness plays a role in prompting ACP, and (4) an appreciation that ACP is flexible to changes in preferences and circumstances throughout the life-course.ConclusionYoung adults perceive ACP as a worthwhile health behavior and view a lack of information as a major barrier to discussion and adoption. Our data emphasize the need for strategies to increase ACP knowledge, while encouraging population-level, patient-centered, healthcare decision-making.

Well-defined staging criteria would aid in comparison and meta-analysis. Trials that include a control group that receives no therapy may help separate the outcomes associated with prematurity from those associated with PDA.