Background The use of next‐generation sequencing for fusion identification is being increasingly applied and aids our understanding of tumor biology. Some fusions are responsive to approved targeted agents, while others have future potential for therapeutic targeting. Although some pediatric central nervous system tumors may be cured with surgery alone, many require adjuvant therapy associated with acute and long‐term toxicities. Identification of targetable fusions can shift the treatment paradigm toward earlier integration of molecularly targeted agents. Methods Patients diagnosed with glial, glioneuronal, and ependymal tumors between 2002 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed for fusion testing. Testing was done primarily using the ArcherDx FusionPlex Solid Tumor panel, which assesses fusions in 53 genes. In contrast to many previously published series chronicling fusions in pediatric patients, we compared histological features and the tumor classification subtype with the specific fusion identified. Results We report 24 cases of glial, glioneuronal, or ependymal tumors from pediatric patients with identified fusions. With the exception of BRAF:KIAA1549 and pilocytic/pilomyxoid astrocytoma morphology, and possibly QKI‐MYB and angiocentric glioma, there was not a strong correlation between histological features/tumor subtype and the specific fusion. We report the unusual fusions of PPP1CB‐ALK, CIC‐LEUTX, FGFR2‐KIAA159, and MN1‐CXXC5 and detail their morphological features. Conclusions Fusion testing proved to be informative in a high percentage of cases. A large majority of fusion events in pediatric glial, glioneuronal, and ependymal tumors can be identified by relatively small gene panels.

No abstract

Background Patient-physician communication is critical for helping patients understand and complete the complex steps needed to diagnose stage and treat lung cancer. We assessed which domains of patient-physician communication about lung cancer and its treatment are associated with receipt of disease-directed, stage-appropriate treatment. Methods Patients with recently-diagnosed lung cancer were recruited from four medical centers in New York City from 2008 to 2011. Participants were surveyed about discussions with physicians regarding treatment, symptoms and needs. Multiple regression analysis and structural equation modeling were used to assess which communication factors were associated with disease treatment. Results Of the 352 participants, 191 (54%) received disease-directed, stage-appropriate treatment. Unadjusted associations between communication items and treatment found that participants who felt that their physicians explained the risks and disadvantages of lung cancer treatment (P<0.01), discussed their chances of cure (P=0.02), discussed goals of treatment (P<0.01) or who were warm and friendly (P=0.04) were more likely to undergo treatment. Three communication domains were identified: treatment information, physician support, and patient symptoms/needs. After adjusting for known determinants of lung cancer treatment, increased treatment information was associated with higher probability of cancer-directed treatment (P=0.003). Other communication domains (physician support or patient symptoms/needs) were not independent predictors of treatment (P>0.05 for both comparisons). Conclusions These data suggest that treatment information is particularly important for increasing the probability of cancer-directed therapy among lung cancer patients. Clinicians should ensure that they clearly discuss treatment goals and options with patients while maintaining empathy, supporting patient needs, and addressing symptoms.