Objective. 4D dose calculation (4DDC) for pencil beam scanned (PBS) proton therapy is typically based on phase-sorting of individual pencil beams onto phases of a single breathing cycle 4DCT. Understanding the dosimetric limitations and uncertainties of this approach is essential, especially for the realistic treatment scenario with irregular free breathing motion. Approach. For three liver and three lung cancer patient CTs, the deformable multicycle motion from 4DMRIs was used to generate six synthetic 4DCT(MRI)s, providing irregular motion (11/15 cycles for liver/lung; tumor amplitudes ∼4-18 mm). 4DDCs for two-field plans were performed, with the temporal resolution of the pencil beam delivery (4-200 ms) or with 8 phases per breathing cycle (500-1000 ms). For the phase sorting approach, the tumor center motion was used to determine the phase assignment of each spot. The dose was calculated either using the full free breathing motion or individually repeating each single cycle. Additionally, the use of an irregular surrogate signal prior to 4DDC on a repeated cycle was simulated. The CTV volume with absolute dose differences > 5% (Vdosediff>5%) and differences in CTV V95% and D5%-D95% compared to the free breathing scenario were evaluated. Main results. Compared to 4DDC considering the full free breathing motion with finer spot-wise temporal resolution, 4DDC based on a repeated single 4DCT resulted in Vdosediff>5% of on average 34%, which resulted in an overestimation of V95% up to 24%. However, surrogate based phase-sorting prior to 4DDC on a single cycle 4DCT, reduced the average Vdosediff>5% to 16% (overestimation V95% up to 19%). The 4DDC results were greatly influenced by the choice of reference cycle (Vdosediff>5% up to 55%) and differences due to temporal resolution were much smaller (Vdosediff>5% up to 10%). Significance. It is important to properly consider motion irregularity in 4D dosimetric evaluations of PBS proton treatments, as 4DDC based on a single 4DCT can lead to an underestimation of motion effects.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.