This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Background Acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) is a severe manifestation of ulcerative colitis (UC) that requires hospitalisation. Despite significant advances in therapeutic options for UC and in the medical management of steroid-refractory ASUC, the initial treatment paradigm for ASUC has not changed since the 1950s and is based on the use of intravenous (IV) corticosteroids. Approximately 50% of patients do not respond and require further medical or surgical therapy. Interleukin 1 (IL-1) has been identified as a key mediator of colonic inflammation and plays a pivotal role in local activation of neutrophils and a number of downstream inflammatory mediators. The IL-1 axis has been repeatedly identified as a therapeutic target in UC. The Interleukin 1 (IL-1) blockade in Acute Severe Colitis (IASO) trial investigated whether antagonism of IL-1 signalling could improve outcomes in patients with ASUC. Methods We performed a phase II, multicentre randomised (1:1), placebo-controlled, double-blinded trial of IL-1 blockade with short-duration anakinra, given alongside IV corticosteroids to adult patients hospitalised with suspected or confirmed ASUC. The primary outcome was the incidence of medical (ie infliximab/ciclosporin) or surgical rescue therapy (colectomy) within 10 days following the commencement of IV corticosteroid therapy. Secondary outcomes included disease activity, time to clinical response, time to rescue therapy, colectomy incidence by day 98 post IV corticosteroids and safety. The trial aimed to recruit 214 patients across 20 sites in the UK. Prespecified analyses were performed for feasibility and for futility. Results At the time of the prespecified interim futility analysis, 113 patients had been randomised, 55 to placebo, and 58 to anakinra (figure 1). The incidence of medical or surgical rescue therapy by day 10 was higher in the anakinra group than in the placebo group (43% vs 26%). The incidence of colectomy by day 98 was higher in the anakinra group (11% vs 4%). These differences were not statistically significant. Logistic models containing a mixture of baseline stratification factors did not suggest that the need for rescue therapy would be reduced with anakinra treatment and on the advice of the independent data monitoring committee, the trial was terminated for futility. There was a higher incidence of adverse event in the placebo group, the most common was worsening of ulcerative colitis. Conclusion This trial shows that adding anakinra to current standard care with IV corticosteroids in patients with ASUC did not reduce the need for rescue therapy or colectomy. This suggests that IL-1 blockade is not a therapeutic target in ASUC. There were no safety concerns with anakinra treatment.
This investigation tested the effect of priming on pareidolia (the hearing of illusory words in ambiguous stimuli). Participants (41 women, 20 men, mean age 29.95 years) were assigned to primed (n = 30) or unprimed (n = 31) groups: the former were told the study was of ‘purported ghosts voices’, the latter ‘voices in noisy environments.’ Participants were assessed for perception of human voices within recordings of purported electronic voice phenomena (EVP), degraded human speech, normal human speech, and white noise. The primed group had significantly higher perception of voices within EVPs than in degraded speech, this difference was not found for unprimed participants. In contrast to the previous use of this design, the primed group did not have higher perception of voices in EVPs and degraded speech than did the unprimed group. The Aesthetic Sensitivity dimension of the Highly Sensitive Person Scale (HSPS) was associated with detection of degraded stimuli, but not with accuracy of stimulus identification. HSPS score was related to lifetime reporting of anomalous and paranormal experiences. This study partially replicates a paranormal priming effect and shows relationships between HSPS and detection of ambiguous stimuli and anomalous and paranormal experiences.
ObjectivesAllied Health Professionals (AHP) consist of 13 different specialty roles in Wales, sharing the responsibility of promoting and supporting the health and well-being of the population. During the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a shift in care provision, with the increased use of online consultations, such as those using video consultation platforms. However, this shift was associated with uncertainty and hesitancy, and, thus, to understand the usage and reasons for using video consultations, this study aimed to capture the experiences of both AHP and their patients, while investigating each role individually.ParticipantsA survey was distributed to and completed by n=8928 patients and n=4974 clinicians, all AHP were included except for orthoptists and paramedics due to ambiguities in the data. A further 86 clinicians participated in phone interviews.ResultsAll professions had a high prevention of face-to-face with the use of video consultations (68.6% overall and 81.4% of clinicians reported the prevention). However, this was lower for certain professions such as podiatrists, potentially due to the specific patient needs, such as physical assessments. Also, a range of different appointment types were being conducted, and there was a high acceptance of these alternative methods among participants. The interviews with clinicians revealed five important aspects of video consultations: the perceived benefits, the perceived challenges, technology issues and necessary improvements, clinician preference and the future of video consulting. Specifically, the future of video consulting evidenced clinicians’ desire for a blended approach to working, selecting the appropriate modality depending on the situation and patient-specific needs.ConclusionsIntegrating the traditional methods of service delivery (face-to-face), and novel, innovative ways, such as video consultations, can motivate positive transformations for the efficiency and efficacy of health and social care.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.