Objective Autoantibodies against melanoma differentiation-associated protein 5 (MDA5) have been described in several Asian dermatomyositis (DM) cohorts, often associated with amyopathic DM and rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease (ILD). A recent study of a DM cohort seen at a US dermatology clinic reports that MDA5 autoantibodies are associated with a unique cutaneous phenotype. Given the widening spectrum of clinical findings, we evaluated the clinical features of anti-MDA5-positive patients seen at a US myositis referral center. Methods 160 DM patients were screened for MDA5 autoantibodies by immunoprecipitation and antibody titers were analyzed in longitudinal serum samples. Anti-MDA5 positive patients were evaluated for the presence of additional myositis autoantibodies. Patient clinical characteristics were compared by retrospective chart review. Results MDA5 was targeted in 11/160 (6.9%) patients with DM. Of these, nine presented with a symmetric polyarthropathy, six demonstrated overt clinical myopathy and eight had ILD. Eight anti-MDA5-positive patients exhibited the clinical attributes of the antisynthetase syndrome in the absence of Jo-1 or other anti-synthetase autoantibodies. MDA5 autoantibody titers did not correlate with clinical course. Conclusions MDA5 autoantibodies are found in DM patients presenting with a symmetric polyarthritis, clinically similar to rheumatoid arthritis. These patients often have features of the antisynthetase syndrome, but in the absence of antisynthetase autoantibodies. Most anti-MDA5 positive patients had overt clinical myopathy and ILD. The latter, while occasionally severe, typically resolved with immunosuppressive therapy. In this cohort, the MDA5 phenotype is frequently a clinical mimic of the antisynthetase syndrome and is not associated with rapidly progressive ILD.
Anti-HMGCR myositis is usually a chronic disease requiring long-term immunosuppression. Although younger patients had more severe disease and a worse prognosis than older patients, they did not have evidence of a known co-existing muscular dystrophy to explain their persistent, and sometimes progressive, muscle weakness.
Objective Anti-HMGCR antibodies are found in patients with statin-associated immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy and, less commonly, in statin-unexposed subjects with autoimmune myopathy. The main objective of this study is to define the association of anti-HMGCR antibody levels with disease activity. Methods Anti-HMGCR levels, creatine kinase (CK) levels, and strength were assessed in anti-HMGCR positive subjects. Associations of antibody level with CK and strength at visit 1 were analyzed in 55 subjects, 40 of whom were statin-exposed. In 12 statin-exposed and 5 statin-unexposed subjects with serum from 5 serial visits, the evolution of antibody levels, CK levels, and strength was investigated. Results Antibody levels were associated with CK levels (p < 0.001), arm strength (p < 0.05), and leg strength (p < 0.05) at visit 1 but these associations were only significant amongst statin-exposed patients in stratified analyses. With treatment over 26.2 +/− 12.6 months, antibody levels declined (p < 0.05) and arm abduction strength improved (p < 0.05) in 17 subjects followed longitudinally. When analyzed separately, statin-exposed subjects developed decreased antibody levels (p < 0.01), decreased CK levels (p < 0.001), improved arm strength (p < 0.05), and improved hip flexion strength (p < 0.05) with treatment. Anti-HMGCR antibody levels did not normalize in any subject. Conclusion In the entire cohort, initial anti-HMGCR levels correlated with indicators of disease activity; with treatment, antibody levels declined and arm strength improved. Statin-exposed but not statin-unexposed subjects had significant improvements in CK and strength, suggesting a phenotypic difference between statin-exposed and -unexposed anti-HMGCR patients.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.