AimsTo evaluate apixaban single dose safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics and assess the effect of food on apixaban pharmacokinetics.MethodsA double-blind, placebo-controlled, single ascending-dose, first-in-human study assessed apixaban safety, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in healthy subjects randomized to oral apixaban (n = 43; 0.5–2.5 mg as solution or 5–50 mg as tablets) or placebo (n = 14) under fasted conditions. An open label, randomized, two treatment crossover study investigated apixaban pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics in healthy subjects (n = 21) administered apixaban 10 mg in fasted and fed states. Both studies measured apixaban plasma concentration, international normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and prothrombin time (PT) or a modified PT (mPT).ResultsIn the single ascending-dose study increases in apixaban exposure appeared dose-proportional. Median tmax occurred 1.5–3.3 h following oral administration. Mean terminal half-life ranged between 3.6 and 6.8 h following administration of solution doses ≤2.5 mg and between 11.1 and 26.8 h for tablet doses ≥5 mg. Concentration-related changes in pharmacodynamic assessments were observed. After a 50 mg dose, peak aPTT, INR and mPT increased by 1.2-, 1.6- and 2.9-fold, respectively, from baseline. In the food effect study: 90% confidence intervals of geometric mean ratios of apixaban Cmax and AUC in a fed vs. fasted state were within the predefined no effect (80–125%) range. Apixaban half-life was approximately 11.5 h. The effect of apixaban on INR, PT and aPTT was comparable following fed and fasted administration.ConclusionsSingle doses of apixaban were well tolerated with a predictable pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profile and a half-life of approximately 12 h. Apixaban can be administered with or without food.

Multiple oral doses of apixaban were safe and well tolerated over a 10-fold dose range, with pharmacokinetics with low variability and concentration-related increases in clotting time measures.

An open-label, parallel-group, single-dose study was conducted to assess the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of apixaban in 8 subjects with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on hemodialysis compared with 8 subjects with normal renal function. A single oral 5-mg dose of apixaban was administered once to healthy subjects and twice to subjects with ESRD, separated by ≥7 days: 2 hours before (on hemodialysis) and immediately after a 4-hour hemodialysis session (off hemodialysis). Blood samples were collected for determination of apixaban pharmacokinetic parameters, measures of clotting (prothrombin time, international normalized ratio, activated partial thromboplastin time), and anti-factor Xa (FXa) activity. Compared with healthy subjects, apixaban Cmax and AUCinf were 10% lower and 36% higher, respectively, in subjects with ESRD off hemodialysis. Hemodialysis in subjects with ESRD was associated with reductions in apixaban Cmax and AUCinf of 13% and 14%, respectively. The percent change from baseline in clotting measures was similar in healthy subjects and subjects with ESRD, and differences in anti-FXa activity were similar to differences in apixaban concentration. A single 5-mg oral dose of apixaban was well tolerated in both groups. In conclusion, ESRD resulted in a modest increase (36%) in apixaban AUC and no increase in Cmax , and hemodialysis had a limited impact on apixaban clearance.

AIMApixaban is an oral, direct, factor-Xa inhibitor approved for thromboprophylaxis in patients who have undergone elective hip or knee replacement surgery and for prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. This open label, parallel group study investigated effects of extremes of body weight on apixaban pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety and tolerability. METHODFifty-four healthy subjects were enrolled [18 each into low (Յ50 kg), reference (65-85 kg) and high (Ն120 kg) body weight groups]. Following administration of a single oral dose of 10 mg apixaban, plasma and urine samples were collected for determination of apixaban pharmacokinetics and anti-factor Xa activity. Adverse events, vital signs and laboratory assessments were monitored. RESULTSCompared with the reference body weight group, low body weight had approximately 27% [90% confidence interval (CI): 8-51%] and 20% (90% CI: 11-42%) higher apixaban maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the concentration-time curve extrapolated to infinity (AUC(0,•)), respectively, and high body weight had approximately 31% (90% CI: 18-41%) and 23% (90% CI: 9-35%) lower apixaban Cmax and AUC(0,•), respectively. Apixaban renal clearance was similar across the weight groups. Plasma anti-factor Xa activity showed a direct, linear relationship with apixaban plasma concentration, regardless of body weight group. Apixaban was well tolerated in this study. CONCLUSIONThe modest change in apixaban exposure is unlikely to require dose adjustment for apixaban based on body weight alone. However, caution is warranted in the presence of additional factors (such as severe renal impairment) that could increase apixaban exposure.

Background-The lack of evidence-based outcomes data leads to uncertainty in developing treatment regimens in children newly diagnosed with Ulcerative Colitis (UC). We hypothesized that pre-treatment clinical, transcriptomic, and microbial factors predict disease course. Methods-We performed an inception cohort study of 428 paediatric UC patients receiving standardised mesalazine or corticosteroids (CS), with pre-established criteria for escalation to thiopurines or anti-TNFα. RNA sequencing (n=206) defined pre-treatment rectal gene expression. 16S sequencing (n=343) characterized rectal/fecal microbiota. The primary outcome was Week 52 CS-free remission (SFR) with no therapy beyond mesalazine. Findings-Week 52 SFR was achieved in 150/400 (38%) participants; 74/400 (19%) received thiopurines alone, 12¾00 (31%) received anti-TNFα, and 25/400 (6%) colectomy. Lower baseline clinical severity, higher baseline hemoglobin, and Week 4 clinical remission were associated with achieving Week 52 SFR (logistic model AUC:0.70 (95% CI 0.65-0.75), specificity 77% (CI 71-82), n=386). Baseline severity and week 4 remission were validated inan independent cohort of 274 participants. An antimicrobial peptide gene signature (OR:0.6, p=0.002) and Ruminococcaceae (OR:1.4, p=0.04) and Sutterella (OR: 0.8, p=0.05) abundance were independently associated with SFR after adjusting for the clinical predictors. Amongst moderateto-severe patients, escalation to anti-TNFα was associated with increased baseline clinical severity and decreased hemoglobin, serum 25 (OH) D, and rectal eosinophils (logistic model AUC:0.78 (95% CI 0.72-0.84), specificity 85% (CI 78-93), n=232). A rectal transportgene signature (OR: 0.3, p=0.0006) and Oscillospira abundance (OR:0.6, p=0.02) were independently associated with escalation to anti-TNFα after adjusting for the clinical predictors. Interpretation-Our findings support the utility of using initial clinical activity and treatment response by 4 weeks to predict Week 52 CS-free remission with mesalazine alone in children newly diagnosed with UC. The development of personalized clinical and biological signatures holds the promise of informing UC therapeutic decisions.