Accurate estimates of the magnetic coupling in binuclear complexes can be obtained from ab initio configuration interaction ͑CI͒ calculations using the difference dedicated CI technique. The present paper shows that the same technique also provides a way to analyze the various physical contributions to the coupling and performs numerical analysis of their respective roles on four binuclear complexes of Cu (d 9 ) ions. The bare valence-only description ͑including direct and kinetic exchange͒ does not result in meaningful values. The spin-polarization phenomenon cannot be neglected, its sign and amplitude depend on the system. The two leading dynamical correlation effects have an antiferromagnetic character. The first one goes through the dynamical polarization of the environment in the ionic valence bond forms ͑i.e., the M ϩ¯MϪ structures͒. The second one is due to the double excitations involving simultaneously single excitations between the bridging ligand and the magnetic orbitals and single excitations of the environment. This dispersive effect results in an increase of the effective hopping integral between the magnetic orbitals. Moreover, it is demonstrated to be responsible for the previously observed larger metal-ligand delocalization occurring in natural orbitals with respect to the Hartree-Fock ones.
The nature of magnetic orbitals is analyzed on a series of five Cu(d9)···Cu(d9) complexes, comparing various theoretical approaches. The magnetic orbitals are usually defined from ab initio mean-field calculations. It is shown that they are practically identical for the lower and upper multiplets. Diagonalization of the density matrices obtained from accurate configuration interaction wave functions provides natural magnetic orbitals, which should be considered as the reference information. No appreciable differences between the natural orbitals of both states are observed. The natural magnetic orbitals are significantly more delocalized on the ligands than the mean-field ones. It is shown that the definition of magnetic orbitals from spin-unrestricted density functional theory (DFT) calculations is not straightforward. When carefully determined, the DFT magnetic orbitals appear to strongly overestimate the metal−ligand delocalization. The consequences on the spin density are discussed.
Articles you may be interested inEffective Floquet Hamiltonians for dipolar and quadrupolar coupled N-spin systems in solid state nuclear magnetic resonance under magic angle spinning Deuterium quadrupole coupling tensors in methyl halides: Ab initio effective core potential and liquid crystal nuclear magnetic resonance study Most interpretations of the magnetic coupling J between two unpaired electrons rest upon simple valence models that involve essentially the ferromagnetic direct exchange contribution, K ab , and the antiferromagnetic effect of the delocalization resulting from the interaction between neutral and ionic determinants, t ab , whose energy difference is U. Ab initio valence-only calculations give very poor estimates of J, whatever the definition of the magnetic orbitals, and large CI expansions are required to evaluate it properly. It is, however, possible to define valence effective Hamiltonians from the knowledge of the eigenenergies and the eigenvectors of these accurate CI calculations. When applied to four different complexes, this strategy shows that spin polarization may change the sign of the direct exchange interaction, K ab , and that dynamical correlation results in a dramatic reduction of the effective repulsion U. The present article also shows how K ab , t ab , and U effective parameters can be extracted from density functional theory ͑DFT͒ calculations and that the typical overestimation of J in DFT can be attributed to an excessive lowering of the effective on-site repulsion.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.