PURPOSE.To evaluate the effect of optic disc tilt on the progression of glaucoma in myopic glaucomatous eyes.METHODS. The disc tilt ratio was estimated on disc photographs. Glaucomatous progression was determined either by stereoscopic optic disc/retinal nerve fiber layer photographs or serial visual field data. All participants were categorized into two groups according to tilt ratio (nontilted [<1.3] or tilted [ ‡1.3]). Kaplan-Meier life-table analysis was used to compare the survival experiences (time to confirmed glaucomatous progression) between groups. The hazard ratios (HRs) for the associations between potential risk factors and progression were determined by using Cox proportional hazards modeling.
RESULTS.A total of 85 eyes in 85 myopic glaucoma patients (axial length > 24 mm; mean follow-up, 4.1 years) were included. Among them, 42 eyes (49.4%) demonstrated progression and 43 eyes (50.6%) were stable on follow-up. The mean disc tilt ratio was significantly smaller, and the prevalence of disc hemorrhage higher, in the progression than the stable group (P ¼ 0.032, P ¼ < 0.001, respectively). The cumulative probability of progression was 24.7% in the tilted group and 68.7% in the nontilted group (P ¼ 0.005). Disc hemorrhage (HR ¼ 3.317; P ¼ 0.001) and the tilt ratio (HR ¼ 0.110; P ¼ 0.046) were predictive of progression.
CONCLUSIONS.Myopic eyes with tilted disc demonstrated a smaller probability of glaucomatous progression. Optic disc tilt may be protective against glaucoma progression, or tilted myopic glaucomatous eyes may have less progressive characteristic by nature.
Significant differences in glaucomatous progression were found between eyes with and without optic disc shape alterations, particularly disc tilt. More localised and stable courses of glaucoma progression were observed in eyes with tilted optic discs.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.