Occupational exposure to contaminants created by electronic manufacturing process is not well characterized. The aim of this study was to carry out risk assessments of exposure to welding fume and airborne heavy metals (HMs) in electronic manufacturing workshops. Seventy-six air samples were collected from five sites in Hangzhou, China. In welding workshops, the most abundant contaminant found was welding fume, followed by Fe, Mn, Zn, Cu, Pb, Cd and Cr. The concentration of Mn was positively correlated with Fe (r = 0.906). When compared with non-welding workshops, the Fe content in the air of welding workshops increased significantly (P<0.05), while the Cu content decreased significantly (P<0.05). Singapore semi-quantitative health risk assessment model and EPA inhalation risk assessment model were applied to assess the occupational exposure. In welding workshops, the levels of 8h-TWA calculated for welding fume (range 0.288~6.281 mg/m 3 ), Mn (range Nd~0.829 mg/m 3 ) and Fe (range 0.027~2.234 mg/m 3 ) partly exceeded the permissible limits. While, in non-welding workshops, the average of 8h-TWA for Cu (0.411 mg/m 3 ) was higher than the limit. The risk rates (RR) assessed for Pb (2.4 vs 1.7). Mn (2.0 vs 1.4) and Fe (1.4 vs 1.0) were higher in welding workshops than that in non-welding workshops, but Cu (1.0 vs 2.2) were lower. The mean excess lifetime cancer risks (ELCR) in welding (5.59E-06 per 1000 people) and non-welding (1.88E-06 per 1000 people) workshops were acceptable. The mean non-cancer risks (HQ) estimated for Mn was greater than 10 in both welding (HQ=164) and non-welding (HQ=11.1) workshops. These results indicate that there was a risk of occupational exposure implication in the electronic manufacturing workshops. It's thus suggested reducing contaminant exposure through engineering controls and management strategies, such as efficient ventilation and reducing exposure hours.

Fluorescent lamp manufacturing workers have been extensively exposed to mercury (Hg). Our aim was to assess their health risks using several approved occupational health risk assessment methods, and to find out which method was more suitable for identification of occupational health risks. Work locations, and air and urine samples were collected from 530 exposed workers in Zhejiang, China. Based on the calculated exposure doses, health risks and risk ratios (RRs) as health risk indices, were evaluated using: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Australian, Romanian, Singaporean, International Council on Mining and Metals (ICMM), and Control of Substances Hazardous to Health (COSHH) methods. Among the workers, 86.0% had higher Hg levels than the Chinese occupational exposure limits of 0.02 mg/m3, and 16.7% urine samples were higher than the biological exposure limits of 35.0 μg/g·creatinine. Among workers at the injection, etc. locations, their average RRs, evaluated by the EPA, COSHH and Singaporean methods were 0.97, 0.76, and 0.60, respectively, and were significantly higher than the ICMM (0.39), Australian (0.30) and Romanian (0.29) methods. The RRs from the Singaporean method showed significant correlations with the urinary Hg levels (P &lt; 0.01). In conclusion, the Singaporean method was more appropriate than the others for health risk evaluation because the excessive risks were significantly associated with urinary Hg levels among the workers.

Occupational exposure to contaminants created by electronic manufacturing process is not well characterized. The aim of this study was to carry out risk assessments of exposure to welding fume and airborne heavy metals (HMs) in electronic manufacturing workshops. Seventy-six air samples were collected from five sites in Hangzhou, China. In welding workshops, the most abundant contaminant found was welding fume, followed by Fe, Mn, Zn, Cu, Pb, Cd and Cr. The concentration of Mn was positively correlated with Fe (r = 0.906). When compared with non-welding workshops, the Fe content in the air of welding workshops increased significantly (P < 0.05), while the Cu content decreased significantly (P < 0.05). Singapore semi-quantitative health risk assessment model and EPA inhalation risk assessment model were applied to assess the occupational exposure. In welding workshops, the levels of 8h-TWA calculated for welding fume (range 0.288 ~ 6.281 mg/m3), Mn (range Nd ~ 0.829 mg/m3) and Fe (range 0.027 ~ 2.234 mg/m3) partly exceeded the permissible limits. While, in non-welding workshops, the average of 8h-TWA for Cu (0.411 mg/m3) was higher than the limit. The risk rates (RR) assessed for Pb (2.4 vs 1.7). Mn (2.0 vs 1.4) and Fe (1.4 vs 1.0) were higher in welding workshops than that in non-welding workshops, but Cu (1.0 vs 2.2) were lower. The mean excess lifetime cancer risks (ELCR) in welding (5.59E-06 per 1000 people) and non-welding (1.88E-06 per 1000 people) workshops were acceptable. The mean non-cancer risks (HQ) estimated for Mn was greater than 10 in both welding (HQ = 164) and non-welding (HQ = 11.1) workshops. These results indicate that there was a risk of occupational exposure implication in the electronic manufacturing workshops. It’s thus suggested reducing contaminant exposure through engineering controls and management strategies, such as efficient ventilation and reducing exposure hours.