Background The re-introduction of medical students into healthcare systems struggling with the COVID-19 pandemic raises concerns as to whether they will be supported when confronted with death and dying patients in resource-limited settings and with reduced support from senior clinicians. Better understanding of how medical students respond to death and dying will inform educationalists and clinicians on how to best support them. Methods We adopt Krishna’s Systematic Evidence Based Approach to carry out a Systematic Scoping Review (SSR in SEBA) on the impact of death and dying on medical students. This structured search process and concurrent use of thematic and directed content analysis of data from six databases (Split Approach) enhances the transparency and reproducibility of this review. Results Seven thousand six hundred nineteen were identified, 149 articles reviewed and 52 articles included. The Split Approach revealed similar themes and categories that correspond to the Innate, Individual, Relational and Societal domains in the Ring Theory of Personhood. Conclusion Facing death and dying amongst their patients affect how medical students envisage their personhood. This underlines the need for timely, holistic and longitudinal support systems to ensure that problems faced are addressed early. To do so, there must be effective training and a structured support mechanism.

No abstract

Objectives: To review surgical management and outcomes of missed pediatric Monteggia fractures.Data Sources: A systematic review was conducted using PubMed, Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and the Cochrane Library from inception through March 2, 2020. The keywords were "Monteggia fracture," "missed Monteggia," "neglected Monteggia," "chronic Monteggia," and "chronic radial head dislocation."Study Selection: All original human studies on missed pediatric Monteggia fractures were included. Congenital Monteggia fractures and isolated radial head dislocations were excluded. Data Extraction:The revised Methodological Index for Nonrandomised Studies tool was used to assess the quality of studies.Data Synthesis: Each patient's data were retrieved individually.The x 2 test and Fisher exact test were used to analyze the difference in outcomes for different surgical managements. Multivariate analysis was performed for variables that were significant on univariate analysis.Conclusions: Thirty studies with 600 patients were included.Proximal ulnar osteotomies (P = 0.016) and the absence of transcapitellar pinning (P = 0.001) were the most significant predictors for eventual reduction of radial head. Other surgical management variables were not significant predictors. These include open or closed reduction approach of radial head reduction; presence or absence of ulnar osteotomy; presence or absence of lengthening, angular correction, overcorrection, or bone grafting of ulnar osteotomy; type of fixation for ulnar osteotomy; presence or absence of radial osteotomy; presence or absence of annular ligament repair or reconstruction; and repair or reconstruction of annular ligament.