Background Frailty and cognitive impairment are common in the elderly, with various shared risk factors like hypertension. Frailty is a marker for future cognitive function. Moreover, whether intensive blood pressure interacted with frailty and cognitive impairment is unknown. Methods and Results We performed a post hoc analysis of data from SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial). The relationship between frailty and a composite of probable dementia (PD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) was analyzed. Also, we evaluated the interaction of intensive blood pressure lowering in the relationship between frailty and cognitive impairment. A total of 8537 patients were included in our study, and 35.1% were women. The mean age of these participants was 67.9±9.3 years. According to the baseline frailty index, 1670, 4637, and 2230 patients were in fit, less fit, and frail statuses, respectively. During a mean follow‐up of 4.61 years, 871 cases of PD or MCI occurred. Compared with those in fit status, those with less fit (hazard ratio [HR], 2.14 [95% CI, 1.65–2.77]) and frailty (HR, 4.28 [95% CI, 3.26–5.61]) status had a higher incidence of a composite of PD and MCI. Blood pressure control strategy interacted with the correlation between frailty and cognitive impairment. Intensive blood pressure control (HR, 2.4 [95% CI, 2.0–2.8]) accelerated the relationship between frailty and incidence of PD and MCI compared with the standard treatment group (HR, 1.8 [95% CI, 1.5–2.1]; P for interaction=0.009). Conclusions This study found that the baseline frailty status was a possible marker for the incidence of a composite of PD and MCI. Intensive blood pressure control may strengthen this correlation. Registration URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ ; Unique identifier: NCT01206062.

BackgroundFrailty was found to be common in patients with atrial fibrillation/flutter (AF), but there was still a lack of evidence regarding the relationship between frailty and new-onset AF.MethodsWe performed a post hoc analysis of data from the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT). In addition, we evaluated the relationship between baseline frailty status and new-onset AF in older adult patients with hypertension.ResultsIn total, 7,316 participants were included in our analysis, and a total of 115 new-onset AF occurred during an average of 3.54 years of follow-up. Using SPRINT frailty index criteria, 1,535 fit, 4,041 less fit, and 1,740 frailty were enrolled. Compared with other groups, the incidence of new-onset AF in the frailty group was significantly higher. We constructed three Cox models to assess the relationship between the frailty status (fit group as reference) and new-onset AF. Participants with frailty had a significantly higher risk of new-onset AF compared with the fit group in all the models we used. We combined the fit group and the less fit group into a no frailty group to assess the impact of frailty on new-onset AF in various subgroups. After full adjustment (Model 3), frailty remained associated with the increased risk of new-onset AF compared with the no frailty group [hazard ratio [HR] = 2.09, 95% CI:(1.41, 3.09), p < 0.001]. Additionally, we examined the frailty index as continuous variable to assess the relationship between the frailty index and new-onset AF. The smooth curve showed that log HR appeared to increase linearly. And there was a significant interaction between baseline systolic blood pressure (SBP) categories and frailty on the risk of new-onset AF (p for interaction = 0.030).ConclusionThis study found baseline frailty status was a strong independent risk factor for new-onset AF among older adult patients with hypertension. Screening for frailty should be considered in older adult patients with hypertension to prevent new-onset AF.

Background: Poor cognitive function can predict poor clinical outcomes. Intensive blood pressure control can reduce the risk of cardiovascular diseases and all-cause mortality. In this study, we assessed whether intensive blood pressure control in older patients can reduce the risk of stroke, composite cardiovascular outcomes and all-cause mortality for participants in the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) with lower or higher cognitive function based on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) cut-off scores.Methods: The SPRINT evaluated the impact of intensive blood pressure control (systolic blood pressure <120 mmHg) compared with standard blood pressure control (systolic blood pressure <140 mmHg). We defined MoCA score below education specific 25th percentile as lower cognitive function. And SPRINT participants with a MoCA score below 21 (<12 years of education) or 22 (≥12 years of education) were having lower cognitive function, and all others were having higher cognitive function. The Cox proportional risk regression was used to investigate the association of treatment arms with clinical outcomes and serious adverse effects in different cognitive status. Additional interaction and stratified analyses were performed to evaluate the robustness of the association between treatment arm and stroke in patients with lower cognitive function.Results: Of the participants, 1,873 were having lower cognitive function at baseline. The median follow-up period was 3.26 years. After fully adjusting for age, sex, ethnicity, body mass index, smoking, systolic blood pressure, Framingham 10-year CVD risk score, aspirin use, statin use, previous cardiovascular disease, previous chronic kidney disease and frailty status, intensive blood pressure control increased the risk of stroke [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.93, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.04–3.60, P = 0.038)] in patients with lower cognitive function. Intensive blood pressure control could not reduce the risk of composite cardiovascular outcomes (HR = 0.81, 95%CI: 0.59–1.12, P = 0.201) and all-cause mortality (HR = 0.93, 95%CI: 0.64–1.35, P = 0.710) in lower cognitive function group. In patients with higher cognitive function, intensive blood pressure control led to significant reduction in the risk of stroke (HR = 0.55, 95%CI: 0.35–0.85, P = 0.008), composite cardiovascular outcomes (HR = 0.68, 95%CI: 0.56–0.83, P < 0.001) and all-cause mortality (HR = 0.62, 95%CI: 0.48–0.80, P < 0.001) in the fully adjusted model. Additionally, after the full adjustment, intensive blood pressure control increased the risk of hypotension and syncope in patients with lower cognitive function. Rates of hypotension, electrolyte abnormality and acute kidney injury were increased in the higher cognitive function patients undergoing intensive blood pressure control.Conclusion: Intensive blood pressure control might not reduce the risk of stroke, composite cardiovascular outcomes and all-cause mortality in patients with lower cognitive function.