No abstract

Background: Perioperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage is a major complication of pituitary adenomas transsphenoidal surgery. Lumbar drainage (LD) is a common method of treating CSF leakage. But whether intraoperative LD can prevent CSF leakage during the perioperative period of pituitary adenomas transsphenoidal surgery remains controversial. Clarity on the appropriate use of LD is needed. Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted in the PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of science databases. Articles were included when they compared intraoperative LD with intraoperative no-LD CSF leakage rates during pituitary adenomas transsphenoidal surgery. Results: Overall, 5 studies containing 678 cases met the inclusion criteria. When data were provided on intraoperative CSF leakage rates, the meta-analysis showed a significant difference in favor of intraoperative LD. When data were provided on postoperative CSF leakage rates, the meta-analysis also demonstrated a significant difference in favor of intraoperative LD. Conclusions: Although the results of this meta-analysis suggest intraoperative LD can reduce the risk of CSF leakage during the perioperative period of pituitary adenomas transsphenoidal surgery, the available evidence is indefinite. To some extent the results suggest intraoperative LD's potential positive role. Further studies that include well-designed prospective, randomized controlled clinical trials are necessary for further verification.

Background Transsphenoidal surgery is the preferred first-line therapy for most pituitary adenoma(PA), and the conventional strategy of treatment is intracapsular resection(IR). The protocol of extracapsular resection(ER), which considers the pseudocapsule as the PA boundary for surgical removal, has also been introduced gradually. In this study, the clinical efficacies and complications were explored and compared between these two procedures. Methods A systematic literature review was performed in the PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane databases. Articles comparing between IR and ER were included. Results There were 7 studies containing 1768 cases in accordance with the inclusion criteria. Although the meta-analysis showed no significant difference in complete resection, a sensitivity analysis revealed that ER was more conducive to total PA resection than IR. Moreover, we found a significant difference in favor of ER regarding biochemical remission. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the incidence rate of certain complications, such as hormone deficiency, diabetes insipidus, intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid(CSF) and postoperative CSF leakage. However, a sensitivity analysis suggested that IR decreased the risk of intraoperative CSF leakage. Conclusions This meta-analysis unveiled that ER contributed to biochemical remission. To some extent, our results also showed that ER played a positive role in complete resection, but that IR reduced the incidence of intraoperative CSF leakage. However, the available evidence needs to be further authenticated using well-designed prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled clinical trials.

No abstract

Background: Stroke, including ischemic stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage, and subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), remains a leading cause of mortality globally. Different stroke subtypes have similar detrimental effects in multiple fields of health. Previous research has shown that metformin plays a neuroprotective role in experimental animal models of stroke; however, a preclinical quantitative analysis on the ability of metformin to treat stroke is still lacking. This meta-analysis evaluates the efficacy of metformin in improving stroke prognosis in rodent models of stroke.Methods: Relevant preclinical trials were retrieved from PubMed, EMBASE, and the Web of Science. The neurological score (NS), brain water content (BWC), infarct size, rotarod test, TUNEL, neuron quantity, microglia quantity, and p-AMPK levels were compared between a control group and a metformin group using the standardized mean difference (SMD) and corresponding confidence interval (CI). Quality was assessed with SYRCLE’s risk of bias tool.Results: Fifteen articles published from 2010 to 2022 were included in the meta-analysis. The metformin group had statistically significant differences compared to the control group in the following aspects: NS (SMD −1.45; 95% CI −2.32, −0.58; p = 0.001), BWC (SMD −3.22; 95% CI −4.69, −1.76; p < 0.0001), infarct size (SMD −2.90; 95% CI −3.95, −1.85; p < 0.00001), rotarod test (SMD 2.55; 95% CI 1.87, 3.23; p < 0.00001), TUNEL (SMD -3.63; 95% CI −5.77, −1.48; p = 0.0009), neuron quantity (SMD 3.42; 95% CI 2.51, 4.34; p < 0.00001), microglia quantity (SMD −3.06; 95% CI -4.69, −1.44; p = 0.0002), and p-AMPK levels (SMD 2.92; 95% CI 2.02, 3.82; p < 0.00001). Furthermore, sensitivity analysis and stratified analysis were conducted for heterogeneous outcome indicators.Conclusion: Overall, metformin treatment improves severe outcomes triggered by stroke. Despite the limitations intrinsic to animal studies, this systematic review may provide a vital reference for future high-quality preclinical trials and clinical use.