Departmental sources Background: The objective of the study was to identify risk factors for poor prognosis of cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) with subaxial cervical fracture-dislocation after surgical treatment. Material/Methods: A total of 60 cervical SCI patients with subaxial cervical fracture-dislocation were primarily included in the study from April 2013 to April 2018. All the enrolled subjects received surgical treatment. The enrolled patients with complete follow-up record were divided into 2 groups based on the neural function prognosis: a non-functional restoration group and a functional restoration group. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors for poor prognosis of SCI after surgical treatment. Results: Fifty-five subjects were included in this study, and the follow-up time ranged from 8.5 to 44.5 months. A total of 25 subjects were categorized into the non-functional restoration group and 30 subjects into the functional restoration group. According to the results of multivariate regression analysis, time from injury to operation (more than 3.8 days), subaxial cervical injury classification (SLIC, score more than 7.5), and maximum spinal cord compression (MSCC, more than 55.8%) are independent risk factors for poor prognosis of SCI after surgical treatment (p<0.05), with AUCs of 0.95 (time from injury to operation), 0.91 (SLIC score), and 0.96 (MSCC). Conclusions: Time from injury to operation (more than 3.8 days), SLIC score (more than 7.5), and MSCC (more than 55.8%) are independent risk factors for poor prognosis of SCI with subaxial cervical fracture-dislocation after surgical treatment.
Purpose
To assess the clinical efficacy of converting partial articular supraspinatus tendon avulsion (PASTA) lesions to full-thickness tears through a small local incision of the bursal-side supraspinatus tendon followed by repair.
Methods
We retrospectively analyzed 41 patients with Ellman grade 3 PASTA lesions and an average age of (54.7 ± 11.4) years from March 2013 to July 2017. Patients without regular conservative treatment and concomitant with other shoulder pathologies or previous shoulder surgery were excluded from the study. The tears were confirmed via arthroscopy, and a polydioxanone suture was placed to indicate the position of each tear. A small incision of approximately 6 mm was made using a plasma scalpel on the bursal-side supraspinatus tendon around the positioned suture to convert the partial tear into a full-thickness tear. The torn rotator cuff was sutured through the full thickness using a suture passer after inserting a 4.5-mm double-loaded suture anchor. Data were analyzed using a paired Student’s
t
-test with statistical significance defined as
p
<0.05.
Results
At the final follow-up of 2 years, the pain-free shoulder joint range of motion and visual analog scale score were significantly improved compared to those before surgery (
p
< 0.001). The postoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons shoulder score was (90.6 ± 6.2), which was significantly higher than the preoperative score of (47.9 ± 8.3) (
p
< 0.001). The University of California at Los Angeles shoulder rating scale score increased from (14.7 ± 4.1) prior to surgery to (32.6 ± 3.4) points after surgery (
p
< 0.001). No patient had joint stiffness.
Conclusion
This modified tear completion repair, by conversion to full-thickness tears through a small incision, has less damage to the supraspinatus tendon on the side of the bursa compared to traditional tear completion repair in the treatment of PASTA lesions. This surgical method is a simple and effective treatment that can effectively alleviate pain and improve shoulder joint function.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.