1. The electrophysiological responses of single units in the dorsal cochlear nucleus of unanesthetized decerebrate Mongolian gerbil (Meriones unguiculatus) were recorded. Units were classified according to the response map scheme of Evans and Nelson as modified by Young and Brownell, Young and Voigt, and Shofner and Young. Type II units have a V-shaped excitatory response map similar to typical auditory nerve tuning curves but little or no spontaneous activity (SpAc < 2.5 spikes/s) and little or no response to noise. Type I/III units also have a V-shaped excitatory map and SpAc < 2.5 spikes/s, but have an excitatory response to noise. Type III units have a V-shaped excitatory map with inhibitory sidebands, SpAc > 2.5 spikes/s, and an excitatory response to noise. Type IV-T units typically also have a V-shaped excitatory map with inhibitory sidebands, but have a highly nonmonotonic rate versus level response to best frequency (BF) tones like type IV units, SpAc > 2.5 spikes/s, and an excitatory response to noise. Type IV units have a predominantly inhibitory response map above an island of excitation of BF, SpAc > 2.5 spikes/s, and an excitatory response to noise. We present results for 133 units recorded with glass micropipette electrodes. The purpose of this study was to establish a normative response map data base in this species for ongoing structure/function and correlation studies. 2. The major types of units (type II, type I/III, type III, type IV-T, and type IV) found in decerebrate cat are found in decerebrate gerbil. However, the percentage of type II (7.5%) and type IV (11.3%) units encountered are smaller and the percentage of type III (62.4%) units is larger in decerebrate gerbil than in decerebrate cat. In comparison, Shofner and Young found 18.5% type II units, 30.6% type IV units, and 23.1% type III units using metal electrodes. 3. Two new unit subtypes are described in gerbil: type III-i and type IV-i units. Type III-i units are similar to type III units except that type III-i units are inhibited by low levels of noise and excited by high levels of noise whereas type III units have strictly excitatory responses to noise. Type IV-i units are similar to type IV units except that type IV-i units are excited by low levels of noise and become inhibited by high levels of noise whereas type IV units have strictly excitatory responses to noise. Type III-i units are approximately 30% of the type III population and type IV-i units are approximately 50% of the type IV population. 4. On the basis of the paucity of classic type II units and the reciprocal responses to broadband noise of type III-i and type IV-i units, we postulate that some gerbil type III-i units are the same cell type and have similar synaptic connections as cat type II units. 5. Type II and type I/III units are distinguished from one another on the basis of both their relative noise response, rho, and the normalized slope of the BF tone rate versus level functions beyond the first maximum. Previously, type II units were defined to be those ...

In an effort to establish relationships between cell physiology and morphology in the dorsal cochlear nucleus (DCN), intracellular single-unit recording and marking experiments were conducted on decerebrate gerbils using horseradish peroxidase (HRP)- or neurobiotin-filled micropipettes. Intracellular responses to acoustic (tone and broadband noise bursts) and electric current-pulse stimuli were recorded and associated with cell morphology. Units were classified according to the response map scheme (type I to type V). Results from 19 identified neurons, including 13 fusiform cells, 2 giant cells, and 4 cartwheel cells, reveal correlations between cell morphology of these neurons and their acoustic responses. Most fusiform cells (8/13) are associated with type III unit response properties. A subset of fusiform cells was type I/III units (2), type III-i units (2), and a type IV-T unit. The giant cells were associated with type IV-i unit response properties. Cartwheel cells all had weak acoustic responses that were difficult to classify. Some measures of membrane properties also were correlated with cell morphology but to a lesser degree. Giant cells and all but one fusiform cell fired only simple action potentials (APs), whereas all cartwheel cells discharged complex APs. Giant and fusiform cells all had monotonic rate versus current level curves, whereas cartwheel cells had nonmonotonic curves. This implies that inhibitory acoustic responses, resulting in nonmonotonic rate versus sound level curves, are due to local inhibitory interactions rather than strictly to membrane properties. A complex-spiking fusiform cell with type III unit properties suggests that cartwheel cells are not the only complex-spiking cells in DCN. The diverse response properties of the DCN's fusiform cells suggests that they are very sensitive to the specific complement of excitatory and inhibitory inputs they receive.

Intracellular recording experiments on the dorsal cochlear nuclei of unanesthetized decerebrate gerbils were conducted. Acceptable recordings were those in which resting potentials were -50 mV or less and action potentials (APs) were > or = 40 mV. Responses to short-duration tones and noise, and to current pulses delivered via recording electrodes, were acquired. Units were classified according to the response map scheme (types I-IV). Ninety-two acceptable recordings were made. Most units had simple APs (simple-spiking units); nine units had both simple and complex APs, which are bursts of spikes embedded on slow, transient depolarizations (complex-spiking units). Of 83 simple-spiking units, 46 were classified as follows: type I/III (9 units), type II (9 units), type III (25 units), type IV (2 units), and type IV-T (1 unit). One complex-spiking unit was classifiable (a type III unit); six were unclassifiable because of weak acoustic responses. Classifying 39 other simple-spiking units and 2 complex-spiking units was impossible, because they were either injured or lost before sufficient data were acquired. Many simple-spiking units showed depolarization or hyperpolarization (approximately 5-10 mV) during acoustic stimulation; some were hyperpolarized during the stimulus-off period. Type I/III units were not hyperpolarized during off-best-frequency (off-BF) stimulation. In contrast, many type II units were hyperpolarized by off-BF frequencies, suggesting that they received strong inhibitory sideband inputs. When inhibited, some type III units were hyperpolarized. Type IV units were hyperpolarized during inhibition even at low levels (<60 dB SPL); sustained depolarizations occurred only at higher levels, suggesting that they receive strong inhibitory and weak excitatory inputs. Several intracellular response properties were statistically different from those of extracellularly recorded units. Intracellularly recorded type II units had higher thresholds and lower maximum BF-driven and noise-driven rates than their extracellularly recorded counterparts. Type I/III units recorded intracellularly had lower maximum BF-driven rates. Type III units recorded intracellularly had higher maximum noise rates compared with those recorded extracellularly. Weaker acoustic responses most likely result from membrane disruption, but heightened responses may be related to weakened chloride-channel-dependent inhibition due to altered driving forces resulting from KCl leakage. Firing rates of simple-spiking units increased monotonically with increasing levels of depolarizing current pulses. In contrast, many complex-spiking units responded nonmonotonically to depolarizing current injection. The monotonic rate-versus-current curves and the nonmonotonic rate-versus-sound level curves of type IV and III units suggest that the acoustic behavior is the result of extrinsic inhibitory inputs and not due solely to intrinsic membrane properties.

No abstract