In this work, grand canonical Monte Carlo (GCMC) simulations were performed to evaluate the separation performance of covalent organic frameworks (COFs) compared with that of metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) for CH 4 /CO 2 /H 2 mixtures. The simulation results show that the adsorption selectivities of COFs and MOFs are similar. The electrostatic contribution of framework charges in COFs should be taken into account, although it is smaller than that in MOFs. In addition, the present work shows that the ideal adsorbed solution theory (IAST) is applicable to most COFs.
This work involved a computational study to investigate the influences of framework charges on CO2 uptake in metal−organic frameworks (MOFs), in which a total of 20 MOFs with different topologies, pore sizes, and chemical characteristics were examined. The results showed that, at atmospheric pressure, the contribution of the framework charges is generally large, and a linear relationship with pore size was found, showing that, when the pore size is larger than 3.3 nm, the contribution becomes smaller than 10%. On the other hand, the framework charge contribution was found to decrease rapidly with increasing pressure and to become less than 10% at pressures higher than 2.0 MPa. This work shows that the framework charge contribution in MOFs cannot be ignored in computational screening of MOF materials for CO2 capture under low-pressure conditions, whereas at moderate operating pressures, the contribution can be ignored in large-scale prescreening such as in the natural gas upgrading process.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.