e21155 Background: Approximately 4% of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)−mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) present EGFR exon 20 in-frame insertions. These mutations confer intrinsic resistance to available EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), as they result in steric hindrance of the drug-binding pocket. Studies have shown that chemotherapy is superior to currently approved EGFR TKIs as a first-line or second-line treatment for EGFR exon 20 in-frame insertions. Nevertheless, the difference in the efficacy of different chemotherapy regimens in patients with EGFR exon 20 in-frame insertions remains unclear. Methods: Data from advanced NSCLC patients harboring EGFR exon 20 in-frame insertions from an independent cohort (Jenn-Yu Wu, 2019) was used to analyze the objective response rates (ORRs), disease control rates (DCRs), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) of different chemotherapy regimens. Results: Thirty-five advanced NSCLC patients harboring EGFR exon 20 in-frame insertions treated with chemotherapy were used to analyze, of which 7 received gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GC), 22 received pemetrexed plus cisplatin (PC), and 6 received taxol plus cisplatin (TC). ORRs were 31.82% for the patients received PC, 14.29% for GC, and 16.67% for TC. DCRs were 72.73% for the patients received PC, 42.86% for GC, and 16.67% for TC. Median PFS was numerically longer in patients who received PC chemotherapy (6.10 m; 95 % CI: 3.46–8.75) than GC (4.20 m; 95 %CI: 2.40–6.00; P = 0.14) or TC (3.40 m; 95 %CI: 1.96–4.84; P = 0.06). Median OS was significantly longer in patients who received PC chemotherapy (22.20 m; 95 % CI: 8.87–35.53) than GC (9.00 m; 95 %CI: 7.46–10.54; P = 0.04), and numerically longer than patients who received TC (8.10 m; 95 %CI: 0.00–22.62; P = 0.19). Conclusions: These results suggest that pemetrexed plus cisplatin may be the preferred chemotherapy for patients harboring EGFR exon 20 in-frame insertions, but further validation is needed in large clinical studies.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.