Patients with triglyceride levels over 1,000 mg/dl are at high risk of developing acute pancreatitis. This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of plasma exchange (PE) in reducing triglyceride levels during an acute attack of hyperlipidemic pancreatitis (HLP). A total of 17 hypertriglyceridemic patients with the complication of acute pancreatitis received one course of PE treatment for one or two consecutive sessions. The respective mean removal rates during a single PE for triglyceride, cholesterol, amylase, and lipase were 66.3, 62.1, 70.0, and 84.8%, respectively. An additional one exchange increased the removal rate to 83.3, 66.2, 85.5, and 87.0%, respectively. For the two-sessions of treatment, the removal rates were higher for triglyceride (P=0.0015) and amylase with a borderline statistical significance (P=0.0641). Better triglyceride clearance correlated well with lower levels of transmembrane pressure (TMP) at 90 minutes after PE (r2=0.5782, P=0.0010) and shorter plasmapheresis duration (r2=0.2241, P=0.0427). Thirteen of seventeen patients (76.5%) recovered completely, eight patients in a single-session, and five in two-sessions. Two patients developed intra-abdominal abscess, necessitating surgical drainage and two patients died due to both septic shock and multi-organ failure. No significant predictor of clinical outcome was identified. In summary, PE treatment is an effective method to clear lipids and enzymes from plasma in a single session for most HLP patients. A greater extraction of triglyceride would result in a reduced TMP and a shorter duration of PE treatment.

Plasma exchange can not ameliorate the overall mortality or morbidity of hyperlipidemic pancreatitis. The time of plasma exchange might be the critical point. If patients with hyperlipidemic pancreatitis can receive plasma exchange as soon as possible, better result may be predicted. Further study with more cases is needed to clarify the role of plasma exchange in the treatment of hyperlipidemic pancreatitis.

ContributorsGIW wrote and revised the manuscript in response to co-author comments. He finalized all the figures and tables, performed the literature search, and assisted with data interpretation. HJK critically reviewed the manuscript and made important suggestions to improve it. He assisted with data interpretation. IBA performed the data analysis, constructed the figures and tables, and made important suggestions to improve the manuscript. H-CK assisted with the data analysis and also reviewed the manuscript. GRC critically reviewed the manuscript and made important suggestions to improve it. He assisted with data interpretation. All other authors were given the opportunity to review the manuscript and make suggestions which GIW received, either revising the paper or providing explanations. All who are not deceased were involved with approval of the manuscript.

Cholelithiasis patients have a higher risk of gastrointestinal cancer, particularly of gallbladder and extrahepatic bile duct cancer. Post-cholecystectomy patients have a risk of colorectal and stomach cancer within the first 5 years and persisting after 5 years, respectively. This paper proposes strategies for preventing gastrointestinal cancer.

Two techniques for plasmapheresis are used in the treatment of myasthenia gravis (MG): immunoadsorption (IA) and double filtration (DF). This controlled study evaluated the differences between these techniques in clinical effects and serological changes. Five patients with generalized MG (clinical states IIb and III) were enrolled; each patient received IA and DF plasmapheresis on separate occasions. Immunosorba TR-350 with an affinity to acetylcholine receptor antibodies (AchRAb) was used for IA, while Evaflux 4A was used as the plasma fractionator for DF. Each course of treatment consisted of five sessions of apheresis. MG score, titers of AchRAb, immunoglobulins (Ig), and plasma biochemistry were assessed by blinded examiners before and immediately after the entire course of treatment. Both treatments effectively ameliorated symptoms of MG. There were no significant changes in MG score between the two groups (IA vs. DF: 2.2 vs. 2.6, P> 0.5). IA had a higher clearance rate of AchRAb than DF (66 % vs. 54 %, P< 0.05), while DF removed more IgA (72% vs. 21%, P< 0.05) and IgM (89% vs. 57%, P< 0.01) than did IA. Although IA removed AchRAb more effectively than DF, the clinical effects between these two treatments were similar. The titers of AchRAb cannot reflect the clinical severity. Some circulating factors other than AchRAb may contribute to the pathogenesis of MG.